BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16887169)

  • 21. Mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations: The current state of the art in the Netherlands.
    Meij R; te Winkel H
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):393-6. PubMed ID: 16289297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of mercury emissions inventories for the Great Lakes states.
    Murray M; Holmes SA
    Environ Res; 2004 Jul; 95(3):282-97. PubMed ID: 15220063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Major sources of mercury emissions to the atmosphere: The U.S. case.
    Thanos Bourtsalas AC; Themelis NJ
    Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 85():90-94. PubMed ID: 30803618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mercury in coal ash and its fate in the Indian subcontinent: A synoptic review.
    Mukherjee AB; Zevenhoven R
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):384-92. PubMed ID: 16183102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anthropogenic mercury flows in India and impacts of emission controls.
    Burger Chakraborty L; Qureshi A; Vadenbo C; Hellweg S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Aug; 47(15):8105-13. PubMed ID: 23834017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of mercury emissions to the atmosphere from coal combustion, China.
    Zhang MQ; Zhu YC; Deng RW
    Ambio; 2002 Sep; 31(6):482-4. PubMed ID: 12436847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Were mercury emission factors for Chinese non-ferrous metal smelters overestimated? Evidence from onsite measurements in six smelters.
    Zhang L; Wang S; Wu Q; Meng Y; Yang H; Wang F; Hao J
    Environ Pollut; 2012 Dec; 171():109-17. PubMed ID: 22892573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Emissions of mercury and other trace elements from coal-fired power plants in Japan.
    Ito S; Yokoyama T; Asakura K
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):397-402. PubMed ID: 16225907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trend analysis from 1970 to 2008 and model evaluation of EDGARv4 global gridded anthropogenic mercury emissions.
    Muntean M; Janssens-Maenhout G; Song S; Selin NE; Olivier JG; Guizzardi D; Maas R; Dentener F
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():337-50. PubMed ID: 25068706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An assessment of anthropogenic source impacts on mercury cycling in the Willamette Basin, Oregon, USA.
    Hope BK
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Mar; 356(1-3):165-91. PubMed ID: 15899511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Updated emission inventories for speciated atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic sources in China.
    Zhang L; Wang S; Wang L; Wu Y; Duan L; Wu Q; Wang F; Yang M; Yang H; Hao J; Liu X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3185-94. PubMed ID: 25655106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Atmospheric mercury in the Canadian Arctic. Part II: insight from modeling.
    Dastoor A; Ryzhkov A; Durnford D; Lehnherr I; Steffen A; Morrison H
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Mar; 509-510():16-27. PubMed ID: 25604938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Global mercury emissions from combustion in light of international fuel trading.
    Chen Y; Wang R; Shen H; Li W; Chen H; Huang Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Su S; Lin N; Liu J; Li B; Wang X; Liu W; Coveney RM; Tao S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(3):1727-35. PubMed ID: 24433051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intercomparison study of atmospheric mercury models: 2. Modelling results vs. long-term observations and comparison of country deposition budgets.
    Ryaboshapko A; Bullock OR; Christensen J; Cohen M; Dastoor A; Ilyin I; Petersen G; Syrakov D; Travnikov O; Artz RS; Davignon D; Draxler RR; Munthe J; Pacyna J
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 May; 377(2-3):319-33. PubMed ID: 17367845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the emission sources of atmospheric mercury in wet deposition across Illinois.
    Gratz LE; Keeler GJ; Morishita M; Barres JA; Dvonch JT
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Mar; 448():120-31. PubMed ID: 23199452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions.
    Zhang Y; Jacob DJ; Horowitz HM; Chen L; Amos HM; Krabbenhoft DP; Slemr F; St Louis VL; Sunderland EM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(3):526-31. PubMed ID: 26729866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Development of mercury emission inventory from coal combustion in China].
    Jiang JK; Hao JM; Wu Y; Streets DG; Duan L; Tian HZ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 Mar; 26(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 16004296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Emissions of biogenic VOC from forest ecosystems in central Europe: estimation and comparison with anthropogenic emission inventory.
    Zemankova K; Brechler J
    Environ Pollut; 2010 Feb; 158(2):462-9. PubMed ID: 19773106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decline in atmospheric mercury deposition in London.
    Yang H; Berry A; Rose N; Berg T
    J Environ Monit; 2009 Aug; 11(8):1518-22. PubMed ID: 19657537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temporal and spatial distribution of atmospheric antimony emission inventories from coal combustion in China.
    Tian HZ; Zhao D; He MC; Wang Y; Cheng K
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Jun; 159(6):1613-9. PubMed ID: 21421279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.