1188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16887251)
1. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk assessment of dietary exposures to compounds that are genotoxic and carcinogenic--an overview.
Dybing E; O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Sanner T
Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 18584977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of thresholds on the risk assessment of carcinogens in food.
Pratt I; Barlow S; Kleiner J; Larsen JC
Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19442758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic.
Benford D; Bolger PM; Carthew P; Coulet M; DiNovi M; Leblanc JC; Renwick AG; Setzer W; Schlatter J; Smith B; Slob W; Williams G; Wildemann T
Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 48 Suppl 1():S2-24. PubMed ID: 20113851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of carcinogenic and in vivo genotoxic potency estimates.
Sanner T; Dybing E
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 96(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 15679476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards a harmonized approach for risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in the European Union.
Crebelli R
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2006; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 17033132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk assessment of carcinogens in food.
Barlow S; Schlatter J
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 19909764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: methyleugenol, CASRN: 93-15-2.
Smith B; Cadby P; Leblanc JC; Setzer RW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 48 Suppl 1():S89-97. PubMed ID: 20113858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of cumulative carcinogenic risk for multiple genotoxic impurities in a new drug substance.
Bercu JP; Hoffman WP; Lee C; Ness DK
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Aug; 51(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 18550240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: furan (CAS No. 110-00-9).
Carthew P; DiNovi M; Setzer RW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 48 Suppl 1():S69-74. PubMed ID: 20113857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of the margin of exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic. Example: leucomalachite green.
Renwick A; Leblanc JC; Setzer RW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 48 Suppl 1():S75-80. PubMed ID: 19786059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of the Margin of Exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: benzene, CAS: 71-43-2.
Smith B; Cadby P; DiNovi M; Setzer RW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 48 Suppl 1():S49-56. PubMed ID: 20113854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk assessment of substances that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic report of an International Conference organized by EFSA and WHO with support of ILSI Europe.
Barlow S; Renwick AG; Kleiner J; Bridges JW; Busk L; Dybing E; Edler L; Eisenbrand G; Fink-Gremmels J; Knaap A; Kroes R; Liem D; Müller DJ; Page S; Rolland V; Schlatter J; Tritscher A; Tueting W; Würtzen G
Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1636-50. PubMed ID: 16891049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SOS chromotest results in a broader context: empirical relationships between genotoxic potency, mutagenic potency, and carcinogenic potency.
White PA; Rasmussen JB
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1996; 27(4):270-305. PubMed ID: 8665872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Addressing nonlinearity in the exposure-response relationship for a genotoxic carcinogen: cancer potency estimates for ethylene oxide.
Kirman CR; Sweeney LM; Teta MJ; Sielken RL; Valdez-Flores C; Albertini RJ; Gargas ML
Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1165-83. PubMed ID: 15563286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: aflatoxin B1 (AFB1).
Benford D; Leblanc JC; Setzer RW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 48 Suppl 1():S34-41. PubMed ID: 20113853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds.
Nesslany F; Zennouche N; Simar-Meintières S; Talahari I; Nkili-Mboui EN; Marzin D
Mutat Res; 2007 Jun; 630(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 17507283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
