235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16889394)
1. Protein fouling of virus filtration membranes: effects of membrane orientation and operating conditions.
Syedain ZH; Bohonak DM; Zydney AL
Biotechnol Prog; 2006; 22(4):1163-9. PubMed ID: 16889394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of solution pH on protein transmission and membrane capacity during virus filtration.
Bakhshayeshi M; Zydney AL
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 May; 100(1):108-17. PubMed ID: 18080342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater.
Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Leal AI; González M
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1438-45. PubMed ID: 18650003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization.
Miller DJ; Paul DR; Freeman BD
Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):035003. PubMed ID: 23556842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative analysis of membrane fouling by protein mixtures using MALDI-MS.
Chan R; Chen V; Bucknall MP
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Jan; 85(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 14705002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clarification of yeast cell suspensions by depth filtration.
Chandler MA; Zydney AL
Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(5):1552-7. PubMed ID: 16209561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New parameter for monitoring fouling during ultrafiltration of WWTP effluent.
Roorda JH; van der Graaf JH
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):241-8. PubMed ID: 11436787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of protein fouling during ultrafiltration using a two-layer membrane model.
Boyd RF; Zydney AL
Biotechnol Bioeng; 1998 Aug; 59(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 10099359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scale-up of Sterilizing-grade Membrane Filters from Discs to Pleated Cartridges: Effects of Operating Parameters and Solution Properties.
Kumar A; Martin J; Kuriyel R
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 25691716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of membrane morphology on system capacity during normal flow microfiltration.
Zydney AL; Ho CC
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Sep; 83(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 12827695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of filtration characteristics in submerged microfiltration for drinking water treatment.
Lee S; Park PK; Kim JH; Yeon KM; Lee CH
Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3109-21. PubMed ID: 18387649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protein fouling during constant-flux virus filtration: Mechanisms and modeling.
Peles J; Cacace B; Carbrello C; Giglia S; Zydney AL
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2023 Nov; 120(11):3357-3367. PubMed ID: 37489799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions.
Huang H; Lee N; Young T; Gary A; Lozier JC; Jacangelo JG
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3823-32. PubMed ID: 17644151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of operational parameters on cake formation of CaSO4 in nanofiltration.
Lin CJ; Shirazi S; Rao P; Agarwal S
Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(4):806-16. PubMed ID: 16427114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transition in fouling mechanism in microfiltration of a surface water.
Yamamura H; Chae S; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3812-22. PubMed ID: 17631376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Filtration method characterizing the reversibility of colloidal fouling layers at a membrane surface: analysis through critical flux and osmotic pressure.
Espinasse B; Bacchin P; Aimar P
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Apr; 320(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 18279884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective factors in the treatment of kerosene-water emulsion by using UF membranes.
Rezvanpour A; Roostaazad R; Hesampour M; Nyström M; Ghotbi C
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jan; 161(2-3):1216-24. PubMed ID: 18539388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
