510 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16890675)
1. Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome.
Pinthus JH; Witkos M; Fleshner NE; Sweet J; Evans A; Jewett MA; Krahn M; Alibhai S; Trachtenberg J
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):979-84; discussion 984. PubMed ID: 16890675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy.
Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Crispen PL; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Sebo TJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):95-104; discussion 104. PubMed ID: 19012937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Under staging and under grading in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database.
Grossfeld GD; Chang JJ; Broering JM; Li YP; Lubeck DP; Flanders SC; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 11176485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading.
Dong F; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Magi-Galluzzi C; Reuther AM; Klein EA
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):896-900; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 18207180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies.
Kassouf W; Nakanishi H; Ochiai A; Babaian KN; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 17499289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological features after radical prostatectomy in potential candidates for active monitoring.
Griffin CR; Yu X; Loeb S; Desireddi VN; Han M; Graif T; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):860-3; discussion 863. PubMed ID: 17631347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A single microfocus (5% or less) of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy--can we predict adverse pathological outcomes?
Thong AE; Shikanov S; Katz MH; Gofrit ON; Eggener S; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2436-40. PubMed ID: 18930486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?
Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is biopsy Gleason score independently associated with biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy after adjusting for pathological Gleason score?
Fitzsimons NJ; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2453-8; discussion 2458. PubMed ID: 17085127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
Sved PD; Gomez P; Manoharan M; Kim SS; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 15201746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histopathological prostate cancer characteristics at radical prostatectomy after population based screening.
Hoedemaeker RF; Rietbergen JB; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 10893598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changing nature of high risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Kane CJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Freedland SJ;
J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 17162017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.
Kulkarni GS; Lockwood G; Evans A; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Finelli A; Fleshner NE
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2432-8. PubMed ID: 17497649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
