507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16890704)
1. Is race a positive predictor of cancer on repeat prostate biopsy?
Yanke BV; Salzhauer EW; Colon I
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1114-7. PubMed ID: 16890704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy.
Borboroglu PG; Sur RL; Roberts JL; Amling CL
J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):866-70. PubMed ID: 11490235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era.
Moore CK; Karikehalli S; Nazeer T; Fisher HA; Kaufman RP; Mian BM
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 15592031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer.
Schoenfield L; Jones JS; Zippe CD; Reuther AM; Klein E; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):770-4. PubMed ID: 17233800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The number of cores positive for high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial biopsy is associated with prostate cancer on second biopsy.
De Nunzio C; Trucchi A; Miano R; Stoppacciaro A; Fattahi H; Cicione A; Tubaro A
J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1069-74; discussion 1074-5. PubMed ID: 19150546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of first repeat biopsy cancer detection with suspected local stage prostate cancer.
Fowler JE; Bigler SA; Miles D; Yalkut DA
J Urol; 2000 Mar; 163(3):813-8. PubMed ID: 10687983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a nomogram for predicting positive repeat biopsy for prostate cancer.
Yanke BV; Gonen M; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):421-4. PubMed ID: 15643192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with adjacent small atypical glands on prostate biopsy.
Kronz JD; Shaikh AA; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Apr; 32(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 11331955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the number of cores with high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia predict cancer in men who undergo repeat biopsy?
Naya Y; Ayala AG; Tamboli P; Babaian RJ
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):503-8. PubMed ID: 15028446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of prostate cancer on extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a multivariate analysis model.
Abdel-Khalek M; El-Baz M; Ibrahiem el-H
BJU Int; 2004 Sep; 94(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 15329106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multifocal high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for subsequent prostate cancer.
Lee MC; Moussa AS; Yu C; Kattan MW; Magi-Galluzzi C; Jones JS
J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):1958-62. PubMed ID: 20846692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer detection in men with prior high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical prostate biopsy.
Park S; Shinohara K; Grossfeld GD; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1409-14. PubMed ID: 11342887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel nomogram to predict the probability of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy.
Benecchi L; Pieri AM; Melissari M; Potenzoni M; Pastizzaro CD
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):146-9. PubMed ID: 18485383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The proportion of cores with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on extended-pattern needle biopsy is significantly associated with prostate cancer on site-directed repeat biopsy.
Akhavan A; Keith JD; Bastacky SI; Cai C; Wang Y; Nelson JB
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 17378840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy.
Lane BR; Zippe CD; Abouassaly R; Schoenfield L; Magi-Galluzzi C; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1746-50; discussion 1750. PubMed ID: 18343412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies.
Stewart CS; Leibovich BC; Weaver AL; Lieber MM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):86-91; discussion 91-2. PubMed ID: 11435830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy.
Campos-Fernandes JL; Bastien L; Nicolaiew N; Robert G; Terry S; Vacherot F; Salomon L; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Yiou R; Patard JJ; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
Eur Urol; 2009 Mar; 55(3):600-6. PubMed ID: 18597923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
