These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16890704)
1. Is race a positive predictor of cancer on repeat prostate biopsy? Yanke BV; Salzhauer EW; Colon I J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1114-7. PubMed ID: 16890704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy. Borboroglu PG; Sur RL; Roberts JL; Amling CL J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):866-70. PubMed ID: 11490235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade. Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. Moore CK; Karikehalli S; Nazeer T; Fisher HA; Kaufman RP; Mian BM J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 15592031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer. Schoenfield L; Jones JS; Zippe CD; Reuther AM; Klein E; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):770-4. PubMed ID: 17233800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The number of cores positive for high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial biopsy is associated with prostate cancer on second biopsy. De Nunzio C; Trucchi A; Miano R; Stoppacciaro A; Fattahi H; Cicione A; Tubaro A J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1069-74; discussion 1074-5. PubMed ID: 19150546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of first repeat biopsy cancer detection with suspected local stage prostate cancer. Fowler JE; Bigler SA; Miles D; Yalkut DA J Urol; 2000 Mar; 163(3):813-8. PubMed ID: 10687983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a nomogram for predicting positive repeat biopsy for prostate cancer. Yanke BV; Gonen M; Scardino PT; Kattan MW J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):421-4. PubMed ID: 15643192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with adjacent small atypical glands on prostate biopsy. Kronz JD; Shaikh AA; Epstein JI Hum Pathol; 2001 Apr; 32(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 11331955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the number of cores with high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia predict cancer in men who undergo repeat biopsy? Naya Y; Ayala AG; Tamboli P; Babaian RJ Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):503-8. PubMed ID: 15028446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of prostate cancer on extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a multivariate analysis model. Abdel-Khalek M; El-Baz M; Ibrahiem el-H BJU Int; 2004 Sep; 94(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 15329106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multifocal high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for subsequent prostate cancer. Lee MC; Moussa AS; Yu C; Kattan MW; Magi-Galluzzi C; Jones JS J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):1958-62. PubMed ID: 20846692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer detection in men with prior high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical prostate biopsy. Park S; Shinohara K; Grossfeld GD; Carroll PR J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1409-14. PubMed ID: 11342887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel nomogram to predict the probability of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. Benecchi L; Pieri AM; Melissari M; Potenzoni M; Pastizzaro CD J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):146-9. PubMed ID: 18485383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The proportion of cores with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on extended-pattern needle biopsy is significantly associated with prostate cancer on site-directed repeat biopsy. Akhavan A; Keith JD; Bastacky SI; Cai C; Wang Y; Nelson JB BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 17378840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy. Lane BR; Zippe CD; Abouassaly R; Schoenfield L; Magi-Galluzzi C; Jones JS J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1746-50; discussion 1750. PubMed ID: 18343412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update. Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. Stewart CS; Leibovich BC; Weaver AL; Lieber MM J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):86-91; discussion 91-2. PubMed ID: 11435830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy. Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. Campos-Fernandes JL; Bastien L; Nicolaiew N; Robert G; Terry S; Vacherot F; Salomon L; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Yiou R; Patard JJ; Abbou CC; de la Taille A Eur Urol; 2009 Mar; 55(3):600-6. PubMed ID: 18597923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]