These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16891230)

  • 1. Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP.
    Tyler DJ; Hudsmith LE; Petersen SE; Francis JM; Weale P; Neubauer S; Clarke K; Robson MD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 16891230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.
    Gutberlet M; Schwinge K; Freyhardt P; Spors B; Grothoff M; Denecke T; Lüdemann L; Noeske R; Niendorf T; Felix R
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Aug; 15(8):1586-97. PubMed ID: 15875193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of cardiac volumes and mass with FLASH and SSFP cine sequences at 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla: a validation study.
    Hudsmith LE; Petersen SE; Tyler DJ; Francis JM; Cheng AS; Clarke K; Selvanayagam JB; Robson MD; Neubauer S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Aug; 24(2):312-8. PubMed ID: 16795076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 7 Tesla (T) human cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using FLASH and SSFP to assess cardiac function: validation against 1.5 T and 3 T.
    Suttie JJ; Delabarre L; Pitcher A; van de Moortele PF; Dass S; Snyder CJ; Francis JM; Metzger GJ; Weale P; Ugurbil K; Neubauer S; Robson M; Vaughan T
    NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 21774009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of cardiac function--comparison between 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience.
    Michaely HJ; Nael K; Schoenberg SO; Laub G; Reiser MF; Finn JP; Ruehm SG
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Feb; 41(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 16428984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FLASH proton density imaging for improved surface coil intensity correction in quantitative and semi-quantitative SSFP perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Nielles-Vallespin S; Kellman P; Hsu LY; Arai AE
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):16. PubMed ID: 25827180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cine cardiac imaging using black-blood steady-state free precession (BB-SSFP) at 3T.
    Basha TA; Ibrahim el-SH; Weiss RG; Osman NF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 19557851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla.
    Schär M; Kozerke S; Fischer SE; Boesiger P
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Apr; 51(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 15065254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D whole-heart coronary MR angiography at 1.5T in healthy volunteers: comparison between unenhanced SSFP and Gd-enhanced FLASH sequences.
    Gweon HM; Kim SJ; Lee SM; Hong YJ; Kim TH
    Korean J Radiol; 2011; 12(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 22043149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved cine displacement-encoded MRI using balanced steady-state free precession and time-adaptive sensitivity encoding parallel imaging at 3 T.
    Kim D; Kellman P
    NMR Biomed; 2007 Oct; 20(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 17211867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phased array ghost elimination (PAGE) for segmented SSFP imaging with interrupted steady-state.
    Kellman P; Guttman MA; Herzka DA; McVeigh ER
    Magn Reson Med; 2002 Dec; 48(6):1076-80. PubMed ID: 12465121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [MR-coronary angiography: comparison of SSFP and spoiled GRE sequence (bright blood technique) and a TSE sequence (black blood technique) in healthy volunteers].
    Thomas D; Krug B; Hackmann D; Gossmann A; Zähringer M; Stützer H; Schnackenburg B; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2004 Nov; 176(11):1589-98. PubMed ID: 15497077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two single-breath-held 3-D acquisitions with multi-breath-held 2-D cine steady-state free precession MRI acquisition in children with single ventricles.
    Atweh LA; Dodd NA; Krishnamurthy R; Pednekar A; Chu ZD; Krishnamurthy R
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 May; 46(5):637-45. PubMed ID: 26902296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multishot EPI-SSFP in the heart.
    Herzka DA; Kellman P; Aletras AH; Guttman MA; McVeigh ER
    Magn Reson Med; 2002 Apr; 47(4):655-64. PubMed ID: 11948726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-dose dobutamine stress steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine MRI at 3T with patient adaptive local radiofrequency (RF) shimming using dual-source RF transmission.
    Berger A; Schnackenburg B; Schneeweis C; Kelle S; Klein C; Kouwenhoven M; Fleck E; Gebker R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(3):746-53. PubMed ID: 25683284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-field MR imaging in pediatric congenital heart disease: initial results.
    Nguyen KL; Khan SN; Moriarty JM; Mohajer K; Renella P; Satou G; Ayad I; Patel S; Boechat MI; Finn JP
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 25086500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of different cardiac MRI sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with respect to signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios - initial experience.
    Gutberlet M; Spors B; Grothoff M; Freyhardt P; Schwinge K; Plotkin M; Amthauer H; Noeske R; Felix R
    Rofo; 2004 Jun; 176(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 15173972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of left atrial volumes at 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla using FLASH and SSFP cine imaging.
    Hudsmith LE; Cheng AS; Tyler DJ; Shirodaria C; Lee J; Petersen SE; Francis JM; Clarke K; Robson MD; Neubauer S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 17578723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac steady-state free precession CINE magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla: impact of parallel imaging acceleration on volumetric accuracy and signal parameters.
    Wintersperger BJ; Bauner K; Reeder SB; Friedrich D; Dietrich O; Sprung KC; Picciolo M; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Feb; 41(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 16428985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal flip angle for high contrast balanced SSFP cardiac cine imaging.
    Srinivasan S; Ennis DB
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Mar; 73(3):1095-103. PubMed ID: 24700652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.