170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16891231)
21. Wall shear stress calculation in ascending aorta using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Investigating effective ways to calculate it in clinical practice.
Efstathopoulos EP; Patatoukas G; Pantos I; Benekos O; Katritsis D; Kelekis NL
Phys Med; 2008 Dec; 24(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 18289907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vivo wall shear stress measurements using phase-contrast MRI.
Pantos I; Patatoukas G; Efstathopoulos EP; Katritsis D
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2007 Sep; 5(5):927-38. PubMed ID: 17867922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproducibility of wall shear stress assessment with the paraboloid method in the internal carotid artery with velocity encoded MRI in healthy young individuals.
Box FM; van der Geest RJ; van der Grond J; van Osch MJ; Zwinderman AH; Palm-Meinders IH; Doornbos J; Blauw GJ; van Buchem MA; Reiber JH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):598-605. PubMed ID: 17729354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Is flow in the common carotid artery fully developed?
Ford MD; Xie YJ; Wasserman BA; Steinman DA
Physiol Meas; 2008 Nov; 29(11):1335-49. PubMed ID: 18854602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Wall shear stress gradient analysis within an idealized stenosis using non-Newtonian flow.
Schirmer CM; Malek AM
Neurosurgery; 2007 Oct; 61(4):853-63; discussion 863-4. PubMed ID: 17986948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Three-dimensional analysis of segmental wall shear stress in the aorta by flow-sensitive four-dimensional-MRI.
Frydrychowicz A; Stalder AF; Russe MF; Bock J; Bauer S; Harloff A; Berger A; Langer M; Hennig J; Markl M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 19557849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of the effects of different pulsatile inlet profiles on the hemodynamical properties of blood flow in patient specific carotid artery with stenosis.
Piskin S; Serdar Celebi M
Comput Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 43(6):717-28. PubMed ID: 23668347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of the flow in stenosed carotid artery bifurcation models--hydrogen-bubble visualisation.
Palmen DE; van de Vosse FN; Janssen JD; van Dongen ME
J Biomech; 1994 May; 27(5):581-90. PubMed ID: 8027092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spatial and spectral heterogeneity of time-varying shear stress profiles in the carotid bifurcation by phase-contrast MRI.
Gelfand BD; Epstein FH; Blackman BR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1386-92. PubMed ID: 17083089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of wall shear stress changes in arteries and veins of arteriovenous polytetrafluoroethylene grafts using magnetic resonance imaging.
Misra S; Woodrum DA; Homburger J; Elkouri S; Mandrekar JN; Barocas V; Glockner JF; Rajan DK; Mukhopadhyay D
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(4):624-9. PubMed ID: 16729233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of flow, vessel diameter, and non-newtonian blood viscosity on the wall shear stress in a carotid bifurcation model for unsteady flow.
Box FM; van der Geest RJ; Rutten MC; Reiber JH
Invest Radiol; 2005 May; 40(5):277-94. PubMed ID: 15829825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Wall shear rates differ between the normal carotid, femoral, and brachial arteries: an in vivo MRI study.
Wu SP; Ringgaard S; Oyre S; Hansen MS; Rasmus S; Pedersen EM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 14745752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Common carotid artery stenosis and amaurosis fugax.
Hoya K; Morikawa E; Tamura A; Saito I
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2008; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18190813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automatic accurate non-invasive quantitation of blood flow, cross-sectional vessel area, and wall shear stress by modelling of magnetic resonance velocity data.
Oyre S; Paaske WP; Ringgaard S; Kozerke S; Erlandsen M; Boesiger P; Pedersen EM
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1998 Dec; 16(6):517-24. PubMed ID: 9894493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reconstruction of blood flow patterns in a human carotid bifurcation: a combined CFD and MRI study.
Long Q; Xu XY; Ariff B; Thom SA; Hughes AD; Stanton AV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Mar; 11(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 10739562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A computational study of flow in a compliant carotid bifurcation-stress phase angle correlation with shear stress.
Tada S; Tarbell JM
Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Sep; 33(9):1202-12. PubMed ID: 16133927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accurate noninvasive quantitation of blood flow, cross-sectional lumen vessel area and wall shear stress by three-dimensional paraboloid modeling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity data.
Oyre S; Ringgaard S; Kozerke S; Paaske WP; Erlandsen M; Boesiger P; Pedersen EM
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Jul; 32(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 9669260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The mechanical triggers of plaque rupture: shear stress vs pressure gradient.
Li ZY; Taviani V; Tang T; Sadat U; Young V; Patterson A; Graves M; Gillard JH
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82 Spec No 1():S39-45. PubMed ID: 20348535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography and flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for blood flow and wall shear stress analysis.
Frydrychowicz A; Berger A; Russe MF; Stalder AF; Harloff A; Dittrich S; Hennig J; Langer M; Markl M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):400-7. PubMed ID: 18692649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Noninvasive evaluation of wall shear stress on retinal microcirculation in humans.
Nagaoka T; Yoshida A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1113-9. PubMed ID: 16505049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
