BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16892960)

  • 1. Stomach stapling botched: $4 million verdict upheld.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jun; 47(1):2. PubMed ID: 16892960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. $200 + million verdict: it started with a midlevel's mistake.
    Crane M
    Med Econ; 2007 Dec; 84(23):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 18260545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Could a malpractice mega-verdict wipe you out?
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 2003 May; 80(10):89-91. PubMed ID: 12828031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. State Supreme Court ordered new trial after verdict for $5.1 million. Bedell v. Williams, 2012 Ark. 75-664 (2/23/2012)_S.W. 3.d _-AR.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Jul; 53(2):1. PubMed ID: 22919776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "The medical liability system is melting down".
    Coble YD; Palmisano DJ
    Med Econ; 2003 Mar; 80(6):49-50. PubMed ID: 12698626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of California's Medical Injury Compensation Review Act (MICRA).
    Evans MB
    J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 19(6):329-30. PubMed ID: 15293664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court 'capped' verdict for $2.2 million at $300,000. Chastain v. AnMed Health Foundation, 694 S.E.2d 541(6/16/2010)-SC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Nov; 51(6):4. PubMed ID: 21158266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limiting damages for "pain and suffering" in medical malpractice.
    Sloan FA
    N C Med J; 2003; 64(4):191-4. PubMed ID: 12971246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constitutionality of malpractice non-economic damage cap.
    Weber RD
    Mich Med; 2003; 102(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 14520908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A medical mistake.
    Schmitt CH
    US News World Rep; 2003 Jun 30-Jul 7; 134(23):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 12858780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective legal reform and the malpractice insurance crisis.
    Anderson RE
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):343-55. PubMed ID: 15742580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The anatomy of a lawsuit: Part 6.
    Ashley RC
    Crit Care Nurse; 2003 Aug; 23(4):89. PubMed ID: 12961788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problems with the administration of remittitur in medical malpractice cases. Does a solution exist?
    Keane DB
    J Leg Med; 2004 Mar; 25(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 15204914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liability rhetoric and reality. Medical liability premiums flat as California battles over caps on damages.
    Schencker L
    Mod Healthc; 2014 Nov; 44(44):20, 22. PubMed ID: 25509448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Insurance. California, here we come.
    Haugh R
    Hosp Health Netw; 2002 Oct; 76(10):16, 18, 4. PubMed ID: 12416453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Society attacks med mal challenge on multiple levels.
    Busalacchi S
    WMJ; 2005 Sep; 104(7):11-2. PubMed ID: 16294591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal. Legal experiments.
    Haugh R
    Hosp Health Netw; 2005 Jul; 79(7):20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 16128312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical malpractice and patient safety.
    Avraham R
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Aug; 355(7):735; author reply 736. PubMed ID: 16921589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical liability bill passes House for third year in a row.
    Med Health; 2005 Aug; 59(27):1, 7-8. PubMed ID: 16111078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dr. Ulrich's battle.
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 2005 Feb; 82(4):53-5. PubMed ID: 15801711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.