These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16894004)

  • 1. Comparison of the medical priority dispatch system to an out-of-hospital patient acuity score.
    Feldman MJ; Verbeek PR; Lyons DG; Chad SJ; Craig AM; Schwartz B
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Sep; 13(9):954-60. PubMed ID: 16894004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ability of the medical priority dispatch system protocol to predict the acuity of "unknown problem" dispatch response levels.
    Clawson J; Olola C; Heward A; Patterson B; Scott G
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2008; 12(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 18584494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardiac arrest predictability in seizure patients based on emergency medical dispatcher identification of previous seizure or epilepsy history.
    Clawson J; Olola C; Heward A; Patterson B
    Resuscitation; 2007 Nov; 75(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 17618728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low acuity EMS dispatch criteria can reliably identify patients without high-acuity illness or injury.
    Hinchey P; Myers B; Zalkin J; Lewis R; Garner D
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17169875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utilization of prehospital dispatch protocols to identify low-acuity patients.
    Studnek JR; Thestrup L; Blackwell T; Bagwell B
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2012; 16(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 22239124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of a Medical Priority Dispatch System key question addition in the seizure/convulsion/fitting protocol to improve recognition of ineffective (agonal) breathing.
    Clawson J; Olola C; Scott G; Heward A; Patterson B
    Resuscitation; 2008 Nov; 79(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 18656298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of stroke recognition by emergency medical dispatchers and paramedics--San Diego experience.
    Ramanujam P; Guluma KZ; Castillo EM; Chacon M; Jensen MB; Patel E; Linnick W; Dunford JV
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2008; 12(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 18584497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ability of emergency medical dispatch codes of medical complaints to predict ALS prehospital interventions.
    Sporer KA; Youngblood GM; Rodriguez RM
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 17454806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of emergency medical dispatchers' subjective ability to identify when higher dispatch levels are warranted over a Medical Priority Dispatch System automated protocol's recommended coding based on paramedic outcome data.
    Clawson J; Olola CH; Heward A; Scott G; Patterson B
    Emerg Med J; 2007 Aug; 24(8):560-3. PubMed ID: 17652678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of using EMS dispatch codes to identify low-acuity patients.
    Shah MN; Bishop P; Lerner EB; Fairbanks RJ; Davis EA
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2005; 9(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16036824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical Priority Dispatch System breathing problems protocol key question combinations are associated with patient acuity.
    Clawson J; Barron T; Scott G; Siriwardena AN; Patterson B; Olola C
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2012 Aug; 27(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 22824188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emergency medical dispatch codes association with emergency department outcomes.
    Hettinger AZ; Cushman JT; Shah MN; Noyes K
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2013; 17(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 23140195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using On-scene EMS Responders' Assessment and Electronic Patient Care Records to Evaluate the Suitability of EMD-triaged, Low-acuity Calls for Secondary Nurse Triage in 911 Centers.
    Scott G; Clawson J; Fivaz MC; McQueen J; Gardett MI; Schultz B; Youngquist S; Olola CH
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2016 Feb; 31(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 26758527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of socioeconomic status on out-of-hospital transport delays of patients with chest pain.
    Govindarajan A; Schull M
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 12658247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which emergency medical dispatch codes predict high prehospital nontransport rates in an urban community?
    Hodell EM; Sporer KA; Brown JF
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24028558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of emergency medical dispatch in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Taipei.
    Ma MH; Lu TC; Ng JC; Lin CH; Chiang WC; Ko PC; Shih FY; Huang CH; Hsiung KH; Chen SC; Chen WJ
    Resuscitation; 2007 May; 73(2):236-45. PubMed ID: 17241736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does emergency medical dispatch priority predict delphi process-derived levels of prehospital intervention?
    Sporer KA; Craig AM; Johnson NJ; Yeh CC
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2010; 25(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 20845315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The obstacles to maximising the impact of public access defibrillation: an assessment of the dispatch mechanism for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Cairns KJ; Hamilton AJ; Marshall AH; Moore MJ; Adgey AA; Kee F
    Heart; 2008 Mar; 94(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 17540690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of a system to determine EMS dispatch priorities.
    Palumbo L; Kubincanek J; Emerman C; Jouriles N; Cydulka R; Shade B
    Am J Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 14(4):388-90. PubMed ID: 8768162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of a triage process conversion on the triage of high-risk presentations.
    Asaro PV; Lewis LM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 15(10):916-22. PubMed ID: 18785936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.