These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16895811)

  • 1. Preparing reports for publication and responding to reviewers' comments.
    Guyatt GH; Brian Haynes R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 59(9):900-6. PubMed ID: 16895811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responding to reviewers' comments as part of writing for publication.
    Happell B
    Nurse Res; 2011; 18(4):23-7. PubMed ID: 21853889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dealing with returned manuscripts.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Nov; 50(11):1050-2; quiz 1053. PubMed ID: 19960157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publishing your findings.
    King KM; Price PM
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2003; 13(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 12802838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revising a manuscript: ten principles to guide success for publication.
    Provenzale JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):W382-7. PubMed ID: 21098168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Avoiding the question approach: making direct comments in manuscript reviews.
    Johnson SH
    Nurse Author Ed; 1995; 5(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 7613564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Real Secret to Getting Published: Responding to Reviewers.
    Clark PC; Spratling R; Aycock DM; Marcus J
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2023; 37(5):570-574. PubMed ID: 37354156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Re-writing or how to move from writing to publication].
    Laurent-Beq A
    Sante Publique; 1998 Jun; 10(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 9774909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Some hints about the reviewers' ethical dilemmas].
    Rumboldt Z
    Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Dec; 62(5):443-6. PubMed ID: 19382625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judging words rather than journals or authors: a reminder that peer review continues after publication.
    Erren TC
    QJM; 2007 Dec; 100(12):799-800. PubMed ID: 18089546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mentored residential writing retreats: a leadership strategy to develop skills and generate outcomes in writing for publication.
    Jackson D
    Nurse Educ Today; 2009 Jan; 29(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 18692282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reports of case-control studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP; Elmslie TJ
    CMAJ; 1990 Jul; 143(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 2357677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Caveats in the proficient preparation of an APA-style research manuscript for publication.
    Cash TF
    Body Image; 2009 Jan; 6(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19059816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publish or perish? Evaluation of a writing week.
    Temple-Smith M; Goodyear-Smith F; Gunn J
    Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Apr; 38(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 19350077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publishing study protocols.
    Johnston BD
    Inj Prev; 2008 Apr; 14(2):73. PubMed ID: 18388223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The publication process itself was the major cause of publication bias in genetic epidemiology.
    Calnan M; Smith GD; Sterne JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1312-8. PubMed ID: 17098574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Helping nurses avoid some pitfalls on the path to publication.
    Gilmour J; Panapa S; Russell A
    Nurs N Z; 2007 Feb; 13(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 17380702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.