These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16897227)

  • 1. Sensitivity and specificity of new eye check chart for neuro-ophthalmological diseases.
    Murai H; Kiyosawa M; Mochizuki M; Suzuki T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2006; 50(4):383-386. PubMed ID: 16897227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
    Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CLOCK CHART(®): a novel multi-stimulus self-check visual field screener.
    Matsumoto C; Eura M; Okuyama S; Takada S; Arimura-Koike E; Hashimoto S; Tanabe F; Shimomura Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 59(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 25649519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sectoral analysis of the retinal nerve fiber layer thinning and its association with visual field loss in homonymous hemianopia caused by post-geniculate lesions using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Goto K; Miki A; Yamashita T; Araki S; Takizawa G; Nakagawa M; Ieki Y; Kiryu J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 254(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 26446718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology to standard automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disease.
    Yoon MK; Hwang TN; Day S; Hong J; Porco T; McCulley TJ
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2012; 19(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 22623861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension.
    Kaczorowski K; Mulak M; Szumny D; Baranowska M; Jakubaszko-Jabłońska J; Misiuk-Hojło M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28028959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of visual field defects respecting the vertical meridian and not related to distinct chiasmal or postchiasmal lesions.
    Shikishima K; Kitahara K; Mizobuchi T; Yoshida M
    J Clin Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 13(9):923-8. PubMed ID: 17085298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
    Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity and specificity of the Humphrey Matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias.
    Taravati P; Woodward KR; Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Redline D; Carolan J; Huang CQ; Wall M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):924-8. PubMed ID: 18326713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perimetry techniques in neuro-ophthalmology.
    Donahue SP
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1999 Dec; 10(6):420-8. PubMed ID: 10662247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do visual evoked potentials give relevant information to the neuro-ophthalmological examination in optic nerve lesions?
    Nikoskelainen E; Falck B
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1982 Jul; 66(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 7113679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of optic disc configuration and clustered visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes with hemifield visual field defects.
    Nagai-Kusuhara A; Nakamura M; Kanamori A; Negi A
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19142137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distribution of scotoma pattern related to chiasmal lesions with special reference to anterior junction syndrome.
    Schiefer U; Isbert M; Mikolaschek E; Mildenberger I; Krapp E; Schiller J; Thanos S; Hart W
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 242(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 15069563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A screening method for chiasmal visual-field defects.
    Trobe JD; Acosta PC; Krischer JP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Feb; 99(2):264-71. PubMed ID: 7469863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population.
    Arnalich-Montiel F; Casas-Llera P; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 18982343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can Visual Field Progression be Predicted by Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopic Imaging of the Optic Nerve Head in Glaucoma? (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).
    Danias J; Serle J
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2015; 113():T4. PubMed ID: 26549913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Friedmann visual field analyser tested on neuro-ophthalmological cases.
    Bynke H; Nordenfelt L
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1974; 52(6):861-71. PubMed ID: 4480333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.