146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16898312)
1. Quality assurance in mammography: College of Radiology Survey in Malaysia.
Ho EL; Ng KH; Wong JH; Wang HB
Med J Malaysia; 2006 Jun; 61(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 16898312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.
McLean D; Eckert M; Heard R; Chan W
Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services.
Brandan ME; Ruiz-Trejo C; Verdejo-Silva M; Guevara M; Lozano-Zalce H; Madero-Preciado L; Martín J; Noel-Etienne LM; Ramírez-Arias JL; Soto J; Villaseñor Y
Arch Med Res; 2004; 35(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15036796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assurance in mammography: status of residency education.
Bassett LW; Lubisich JP; Bresch JP; Jessop NW; Hendrick RE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Feb; 160(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 8424332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of mammography equipment in the Macedonian breast screening campaign 2008/2009.
Gershan V; Antevska-Grujoska S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):187-91. PubMed ID: 21733866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992.
Conway BJ; Suleiman OH; Rueter FG; Antonsen RG; Slayton RJ
Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 8153301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.
Jamal N; Ng KH; McLean D
Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):238-45. PubMed ID: 12711643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accreditation of mammography facilities by the American College of Radiology: results of a national survey.
Brown ML; Fintor L
Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7917443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography quality assurance. Current issues.
Hendrick RE
Cancer; 1993 Aug; 72(4 Suppl):1466-74. PubMed ID: 8339240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assurance results from a breast screening pilot study.
Thiele DL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 1953503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography processor quality assurance.
Monda LA
Radiol Technol; 2002; 74(1):46-68; quiz 69-72. PubMed ID: 12362534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evaluation of a clinical thermometer for measuring developer temperature in automatic film processors.
Wilson WB; Haus AG; Nierman C; Lillie R; Batz T; Moore R
Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):823-4. PubMed ID: 8350843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The ACR's Mammography Accreditation Program: ten years of experience since MQSA.
Destouet JM; Bassett LW; Yaffe MJ; Butler PF; Wilcox PA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):585-94. PubMed ID: 17411883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of quality assurance regulatory enforcement on performance of mammography systems: evidence from large-scale surveys in Taiwan.
Hwang YS; Tsai HY; Chen CC; Tsay PK; Pan HB; Hsu GC; Lin JH; Chui CS; Wan YL; Liu HL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W307-12. PubMed ID: 23883245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation.
Haus AG; Yaffe MJ; Feig SA; Hendrick RE; Butler PA; Wilcox PA; Bansal S
Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2297-301. PubMed ID: 11764036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image quality of mammography in Croatian nationwide screening program: comparison between various types of facilities.
Brnić Z; Blašković D; Klasić B; Ramač JP; Flegarić-Bradić M; Stimac D; Lubina IZ; Brnić V; Faj D
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e478-85. PubMed ID: 21715115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guidelines for high quality mammography screening.
Matveeva N; Korneti K; Antevska S; Strateska A
Prilozi; 2008 Dec; 29(2):345-54. PubMed ID: 19259058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards.
Hendrick RE
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 1732931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic image quality and exposure in South East Asia.
Ng KH; DeWerd LA; Schmidt RC
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Dec; 23(4):135-7. PubMed ID: 11376538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
