BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16898432)

  • 1. Point/Counterpoint. The proposed MOC requirements for physicists are reasonable.
    Thomas SR; Garrett JA; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2319-22. PubMed ID: 16898432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The American Board of Radiology Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Program in Radiologic Physics.
    Thomas SR; Hendee WR; Paliwal BR
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):263-7. PubMed ID: 15719977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The American Board of Radiology Perspective on Maintenance of Certification: Part IV: Practice quality improvement in radiologic physics.
    Frey GD; Ibbott GS; Morin RL; Paliwal BR; Thomas SR; Bosma J
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4158-63. PubMed ID: 18072479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Translating an ACGME-required Practice Quality Improvement project into preparation for the Maintenance of Certification Part IV.
    Day K
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Oct; 11(10):1009-10. PubMed ID: 24929919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. American Board of Radiology: maintenance of certification.
    Madewell JE; Hattery RR; Thomas SR; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Merritt C; Davis LW;
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):104-15. PubMed ID: 15691731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maintenance of certification in radiologic physics.
    Thomas SR; Morin RL; Paliwal BR;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Apr; 3(4):299. PubMed ID: 17412064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A closer look at the American Board of Radiology practice-profiled maintenance of certification examination in diagnostic radiology.
    Laszakovits DJ; Becker GJ; Bosma JL; Dunnick NR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 20566792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The maintenance of certification exam: who cares?
    DiSantis DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 20566791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Point/Counterpoint. The ABR written and oral examinations in medical physics as currently conducted are sufficiently comprehensive and demanding to ensure that successful candidates have adequate knowledge and experience to practice in the designated specialty field.
    Hendee WR; Amols HI; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2007 Sep; 34(9):3417-9. PubMed ID: 17926942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recertification.
    Friedenberg RM
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):99A-102A. PubMed ID: 7480716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trajectory.
    Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11):1287. PubMed ID: 27814829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maintenance of certification.
    Madewell JE; Hattery RR; Thomas SR; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Merritt C; Davis LW
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 17411756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ABR examinations: the why, what, and how.
    Becker GJ; Bosma JL; Guiberteau MJ; Gerdeman AM; Frush DP; Borgstede JP;
    Radiology; 2013 Jul; 268(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 23793591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The timing of the oral boards, why radiology has it right!
    Kagetsu NJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):340. PubMed ID: 17467620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The oral boards: why radiology has it wrong and why it must be changed now.
    Baker SR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jan; 5(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 18180000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality, safety, outcomes: do we need a unified approach?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):495. PubMed ID: 22457909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An endangered art: teaching.
    Friedenberg RM
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):317-9. PubMed ID: 10671575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Graduation from a CAMPEP or equivalent accredited graduate or residency program should be a prerequisite for certification in radiological physics. For the proposition.
    Herman MG
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):835-6. PubMed ID: 15895564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of medical physics training and education programs--Canada and Australia.
    McCurdy BM; Duggan L; Howlett S; Clark BG
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 32(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 20169845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parallel/Opposed Editorial: DMP/residency programs are more sustainable than MPAs for the future of the medical physics profession.
    Shi C; Parker BC; Rong Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):330-334. PubMed ID: 30117259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.