212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16898462)
1. Joint two-view information for computerized detection of microcalcifications on mammograms.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Ge J; Wei J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2574-85. PubMed ID: 16898462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated regional registration and characterization of corresponding microcalcification clusters on temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis.
Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Ge J; Helvie MA; Roubidoux M; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5340-50. PubMed ID: 19175093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.
Wu YT; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Ge J; Shi J; Zhang Y; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3334-44. PubMed ID: 17879797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information.
Paquerault S; Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 11865995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal neural network architecture selection: improvement in computerized detection of microcalcifications.
Gurcan MN; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Petrick N; Helvie MA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Apr; 9(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 11942656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.
Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Lo SC; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1555-67. PubMed ID: 8551980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multichannel response analysis on 2D projection views for detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Wei J; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Lu Y; Zhou C; Samala R
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041913. PubMed ID: 24694144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital breast tomosynthesis: computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on planar projection images.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Lu Y; Hadjiiski LM; Wei J; Helvie MA
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(23):7457-77. PubMed ID: 25393654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection of breast masses: four-view strategy for screening mammography.
Wei J; Chan HP; Zhou C; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 21626920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.
Gupta S; Markey MK
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
