383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16898546)
1. Board, quality linked: study.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2006 Jul 3-10; 36(27):18. PubMed ID: 16898546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. CEO evaluation and compensation.
Orlikoff JE; Totten MK
Trustee; 1996 Jan; 49(1):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10155022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. From the top down. Boards play key role in clinical improvement: study.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2006 Jul; Suppl():24, 26. PubMed ID: 16903261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Continually improving governance.
Arrington B; Gautam K; McCabe WJ
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1995; 40(1):95-110. PubMed ID: 10140877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What do we really know about the impact of boards on nonprofit hospital performance?
Sofaer S; Lammers J; Pourat N
J Health Adm Educ; 1991; 9(4):425-42. PubMed ID: 10117522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The link tightens between system boards and management: survey.
Weiner BJ
Trustee; 2002; 55(10):34-6. PubMed ID: 12448228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consumers' expectations of quality and how hospitals meet them. Case 9.
Case Stud Health Adm; 1993; 9():69-72. PubMed ID: 10136275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Formalizing quality management and continuous improvement in an organization where everyone is perfect. Case 10.
Case Stud Health Adm; 1993; 9():73-5. PubMed ID: 10136276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. TQM and the CEO evaluation.
Dolan TC
Trustee; 1993 Aug; 46(8):16-7. PubMed ID: 10127664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Governing performance. Reexamining the board's role in executive compensation.
Hofrichter DA; Hawthorne GW
Trustee; 1997 Jun; 50(6):6-10, 12. PubMed ID: 10168862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The governance team: a firsthand look at leadership practices. The Partnership Study--preliminary findings from Phase 2.
Weil PA; Douglass S
Healthc Exec; 1994; 9(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 10161103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Don't overlook CEO performance evaluations.
Spath P
Hosp Peer Rev; 2001 Oct; 26(10):144-8. PubMed ID: 11586590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Letter to the chairman of the board: reflections on CEO evaluations.
Pryor KT
Trustee; 1994 Apr; 47(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 10133269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Governance: critical issues for hospital CEO and boards.
Barry DR
Front Health Serv Manage; 2005; 21(3):25-9; discussion 43-4. PubMed ID: 15966535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Practical governance: CEO performance appraisal.
Tyler JL; Biggs EL
Trustee; 2001 May; 54(5):18-21. PubMed ID: 11373817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The new governance: five most critical trustee functions in the 1990s.
Coile RC
Hosp Strategy Rep; 1991 Sep; 3(11):1-8. PubMed ID: 10114054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The internal processes and behavioral dynamics of hospital boards: an exploration of differences between high- and low-performing hospitals.
Kane NM; Clark JR; Rivenson HL
Health Care Manage Rev; 2009; 34(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 19104266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of total quality management: conventional wisdom versus reality.
Boerstler H; Foster RW; O'Connor EJ; O'Brien JL; Shortell SM; Carman JM; Hughes EF
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1996; 41(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10157960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining CEO compensation. Paying for performance. Executive compensation should be examined from many different angles.
Friede S
Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(46):S6-7. PubMed ID: 16334822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pay for performance: what trustees should be applauding.
Hawthorne G
Trustee; 2000; 53(7):8-14, 1. PubMed ID: 11785231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
