163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16899092)
1. From observational studies to randomized trials: asking the right question at the right time.
Neaton JD; Mugglin AS
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Aug; 33(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 16899092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Pereira C; Castilho E
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Confounding in health research.
Greenland S; Morgenstern H
Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():189-212. PubMed ID: 11274518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
Pinto A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.
Little RJ; Rubin DB
Annu Rev Public Health; 2000; 21():121-45. PubMed ID: 10884949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy Part 2. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: confounding, effect modification and strength of association.
Shapiro S
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jul; 34(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 18577320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
Touzet S; Colin C
Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Introduction to observational studies: part 2.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 24485743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research.
Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I
BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Counterpoint: epidemiology to guide decision-making: moving away from practice-free research.
Hernán MA
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):834-9. PubMed ID: 26507306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How Do You Know Which Health Care Effectiveness Research You Can Trust? A Guide to Study Design for the Perplexed.
Soumerai SB; Starr D; Majumdar SR
Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jun; 12():E101. PubMed ID: 26111157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Controversy over "contradiction": Should randomized trials always trump observational studies?
Fletcher AE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):384-6. PubMed ID: 19217953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies].
Schaffer P; Velten M
Rev Prat; 2002 May; 52(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 12107937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Explanations for improvement in both experimental and control groups.
Becker H; Roberts G; Voelmeck W
West J Nurs Res; 2003 Oct; 25(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 14528620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?
Vandenbroucke JP
Lancet; 2004 May; 363(9422):1728-31. PubMed ID: 15158638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
