These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16899396)
1. What's so special about the average face? Tsao DY; Freiwald WA Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):391-3. PubMed ID: 16899396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Discrimination learning of rotated faces: a Markov analysis of coding and association processes]. Bäuml KH Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 1598761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing? Richler JJ; Tanaka JW; Brown DD; Gauthier I J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1356-68. PubMed ID: 18980400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition. Collin CA; Liu CH; Troje NF; McMullen PA; Chaudhuri A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):975-87. PubMed ID: 15462634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Matching faces and expressions in pixelated and blurred photos. White M; Li J Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 16550853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Orientation tuning of human face processing estimated by contrast matching in transparency displays. Martini P; McKone E; Nakayama K Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2102-9. PubMed ID: 16384592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Face processing: human perception and principal components analysis. Hancock PJ; Burton AM; Bruce V Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 8822156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is face distinctiveness gender based? Baudouin JY; Gallay M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):789-98. PubMed ID: 16846279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding caricatures of faces. Lewis MB; Johnston RA Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):321-46. PubMed ID: 9621842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images. Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Processing of facial identity and expression: a psychophysical, physiological, and computational perspective. Schwaninger A; Wallraven C; Cunningham DW; Chiller-Glaus SD Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():321-43. PubMed ID: 17015089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition. Cooper EE; Wojan TJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):470-88. PubMed ID: 10764107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Smith JD; Redford JS; Haas SM J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 18473665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The prototype effect in face recognition: extension and limits. Cabeza R; Bruce V; Kato T; Oda M Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):139-51. PubMed ID: 10087863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Face imagery is based on featural representations. Lobmaier JS; Mast FW Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18271353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. Rhodes G; Ewing L; Hayward WG; Maurer D; Mondloch CJ; Tanaka JW Br J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 100(Pt 4):717-28. PubMed ID: 19228441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images. Kemp R; McManus C; Pigott T Perception; 1990; 19(4):531-43. PubMed ID: 2096371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification. Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]