274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16899699)
1. Use of repeated measures analysis for evaluation of genetic background of dairy cattle behavior in automatic milking systems.
König S; Köhn F; Kuwan K; Simianer H; Gauly M
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Sep; 89(9):3636-44. PubMed ID: 16899699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic parameters of milking frequency and milk production traits in Canadian Holsteins milked by an automated milking system.
Nixon M; Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Hand K; Miglior F
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3422-30. PubMed ID: 19528620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feeding patterns and performance of cows in controlled cow traffic in automatic milking systems.
Melin M; Svennersten-Sjaunja K; Wiktorsson H
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Nov; 88(11):3913-22. PubMed ID: 16230697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Joint international evaluation of Milking Shorthorn dairy cattle for production traits.
Barrett R; Miglior F; Jansen G; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3326-36. PubMed ID: 16107423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationships between milk yield and somatic cell score in Canadian Holsteins from simultaneous and recursive random regression models.
Jamrozik J; Bohmanova J; Schaeffer LR
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1216-33. PubMed ID: 20172242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model.
Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations of housing, management, milking activity, and standing and lying behavior of dairy cows milked in automatic systems.
Deming JA; Bergeron R; Leslie KE; DeVries TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):344-51. PubMed ID: 23084886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Best prediction of yields for long lactations.
Cole JB; Null DJ; Vanraden PM
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Apr; 92(4):1796-810. PubMed ID: 19307663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic parameters for tunisian holsteins using a test-day random regression model.
Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Ben Gara A; Gengler N
J Dairy Sci; 2008 May; 91(5):2118-26. PubMed ID: 18420643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins.
Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5314-25. PubMed ID: 19762849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short communication: Genetic evaluation of milking speed for Brown Swiss dairy cattle in the United States.
Wiggans GR; Thornton LL; Neitzel RR; Gengler N
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Feb; 90(2):1021-3. PubMed ID: 17235180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical evaluation of factors and interactions affecting dairy herd improvement milk urea nitrogen in commercial midwest dairy herds.
Wattiaux MA; Nordheim EV; Crump P
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Aug; 88(8):3020-35. PubMed ID: 16027216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic parameter estimation for milk yield over multiple parities and various lengths of lactation in Danish Jerseys by random regression models.
Guo Z; Lund MS; Madsen P; Korsgaard I; Jensen J
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1596-606. PubMed ID: 12146493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mortality, culling by sixty days in milk, and production profiles in high- and low-survival Pennsylvania herds.
Dechow CD; Goodling RC
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Dec; 91(12):4630-9. PubMed ID: 19038939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual differences in behavioral and physiological responsiveness of primiparous dairy cows to machine milking.
Van Reenen CG; Van der Werf JT; Bruckmaier RM; Hopster H; Engel B; Noordhuizen JP; Blokhuis HJ
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Oct; 85(10):2551-61. PubMed ID: 12416807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short communication: genetic trends of milk yield under heat stress for US Holsteins.
Aguilar I; Misztal I; Tsuruta S
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Apr; 93(4):1754-8. PubMed ID: 20338455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of functional aspects in two automatic milking systems and auto-tandem milking parlors.
Gygax L; Neuffer I; Kaufmann C; Hauser R; Wechsler B
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Sep; 90(9):4265-74. PubMed ID: 17699045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Udder health of cows changing from tie stalls or free stalls with conventional milking to free stalls with either conventional or automatic milking.
Hovinen M; Rasmussen MD; Pyörälä S
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):3696-703. PubMed ID: 19620651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feeding soyhulls to high-yielding dairy cows increased milk production, but not milking frequency, in an automatic milking system.
Halachmi I; Shoshani E; Solomon R; Maltz E; Miron J
J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2317-25. PubMed ID: 19389990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
