153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16900302)
1. Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring.
Leslie WD; Moayyeri A;
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(11):1673-80. PubMed ID: 16900302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting short-term bone density precision assessment and the effect on patient monitoring.
Leslie WD
J Bone Miner Res; 2008 Feb; 23(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 17937536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice.
Leslie WD;
Bone; 2006 Aug; 39(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 16537116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which to use to evaluate change in BMD at follow-up: RMS-SD or RMS-%CV?
Kiebzak GM; Morgan SL; Peace F
J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 22154429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo precision of the GE lunar iDXA for the assessment of lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and total body bone mineral density in severely obese patients.
Carver TE; Christou NV; Court O; Lemke H; Andersen RE
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 23896494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo precision of the GE Lunar iDXA densitometer for the measurement of total-body, lumbar spine, and femoral bone mineral density in adults.
Hind K; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 20705494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice.
El Maghraoui A; Do Santos Zounon AA; Jroundi I; Nouijai A; Ghazi M; Achemlal L; Bezza A; Tazi MA; Abouqual R
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1742-8. PubMed ID: 15937633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.
Hamdy R; Kiebzak GM; Seier E; Watts NB
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1772-80. PubMed ID: 17019523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Tothill P; Hannan WJ
Osteoporos Int; 2007 Nov; 18(11):1515-23. PubMed ID: 17483864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone Mineral Density Precision for Individual and Combined Vertebrae Configurations From Lumbar Spine Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scans.
Hind K; Oldroyd B
J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(4):673-677. PubMed ID: 31036447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sample size requirements for bone density precision assessments and effect on patient categorization: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Moayyeri A; Sadatsafavi M; Leslie WD;
Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):679-84. PubMed ID: 17706478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating Lumbar Spine Least Significant Change for Fewer than Four Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
Rosen H; Szalat A; Leslie WD
J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(2):101483. PubMed ID: 38479135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the knee and heel: methodology and implications for research to reduce bone mineral loss after spinal cord injury.
Peppler WT; Kim WJ; Ethans K; Cowley KC
Spinal Cord; 2017 May; 55(5):483-488. PubMed ID: 27995940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some physical and clinical factors influencing the measurement of precision error, least significant change, and bone mineral density in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Frimeth J; Galiano E; Webster D
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 19932980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems.
Shepherd JA; Lu Y
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 17616413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tibial subchondral bone mineral density: sources of variability and reproducibility.
Boudenot A; Pallu S; Toumi H; Loiseau Peres S; Dolleans E; Lespessailles E
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Oct; 21(10):1586-94. PubMed ID: 23887081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term precision of DXA scanning assessed over seven years in forty postmenopausal women.
Patel R; Blake GM; Rymer J; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 10663361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
