BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16900520)

  • 1. Effect of non-feeding period length on the intermittent operation of UASB reactors treating dairy effluents.
    Coelho NM; Rodrigues AA; Arroja LM; Capela IF
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Feb; 96(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 16900520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimum cycle time for intermittent UASB reactors treating dairy wastewater.
    Nadais H; Capela I; Arroja L; Duarte A
    Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(8):1511-8. PubMed ID: 15878022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility studies on the treatment of dairy wastewaters with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors.
    Ramasamy EV; Gajalakshmi S; Sanjeevi R; Jithesh MN; Abbasi SA
    Bioresour Technol; 2004 Jun; 93(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 15051084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anaerobic biodegradation of aircraft deicing fluid in UASB reactors.
    Tham PT; Kennedy KJ
    Water Res; 2004 May; 38(10):2515-28. PubMed ID: 15159155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvement of the anaerobic treatment of potato processing wastewater in a UASB reactor by co-digestion with glycerol.
    Ma J; Van Wambeke M; Carballa M; Verstraete W
    Biotechnol Lett; 2008 May; 30(5):861-7. PubMed ID: 18060602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The performance of UASB reactors treating high-strength wastewaters.
    Aslan S; Sekerdağ N
    J Environ Health; 2008; 70(6):32-6, 51, 55. PubMed ID: 18236935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of UASB and EGSB performance on the anaerobic biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol.
    Puyol D; Mohedano AF; Sanz JL; Rodríguez JJ
    Chemosphere; 2009 Aug; 76(9):1192-8. PubMed ID: 19577792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Degradation of 4-chlorophenol in UASB reactor under methanogenic conditions.
    Majumder PS; Gupta SK
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4169-77. PubMed ID: 17928222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of feeding strategy and COD/sulfate ratio on the removal of sulfate in an AnSBBR with recirculation of the liquid phase.
    Archilha NC; Canto CS; Ratusznei SM; Rodrigues JA; Zaiat M; Foresti E
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Aug; 91(8):1756-65. PubMed ID: 20413213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical modeling and optimization of biomass granulation and COD removal in UASB reactors treating low strength wastewaters.
    Bhunia P; Ghangrekar MM
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4229-38. PubMed ID: 17936620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinetic of carbonaceous substrate in an upflow anaerobic sludge sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating 2,4 dichlorophenol (2,4 DCP).
    Sponza DT; Uluköy A
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 86(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 17254694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of organic, hydraulic and fat shocks on the performance of UASB reactors with intermittent operation.
    Nadais H; Capela I; Arroja L; Duarte A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(4):49-56. PubMed ID: 11575100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the performance of UASB and GRABBR treating low strength wastewaters.
    Shanmugam AS; Akunna JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 18653958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anaerobic treatment of a chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater in a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor.
    Oktem YA; Ince O; Sallis P; Donnelly T; Ince BK
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Mar; 99(5):1089-96. PubMed ID: 17449241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-rate treatment of terephthalate in anaerobic hybrid reactors.
    Kleerebezem R; Ivalo M; Hulshoff Pol LW; Lettinga G
    Biotechnol Prog; 1999; 15(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 10356251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flocculants effect in biomass retention in a UASB reactor treating dairy manure.
    García H; Rico C; García PA; Rico JL
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Sep; 99(14):6028-36. PubMed ID: 18158239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of cane sugar mill wastewater in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor.
    Nacheva PM; Chávez GM; Chacón JM; Chuil AC
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1347-52. PubMed ID: 19717923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrated anaerobic treatment of dairy industrial wastewater and sludge.
    Passeggi M; López I; Borzacconi L
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(3):501-6. PubMed ID: 19214004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance and kinetic evaluation of the anaerobic digestion of two-phase olive mill effluents in reactors with suspended and immobilized biomass.
    Raposo F; Borja R; Sánchez E; Martín MA; Martín A
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(8):2017-26. PubMed ID: 15087182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of empirical models for performance evaluation of UASB reactors treating poultry manure wastewater under different operational conditions.
    Yetilmezsoy K; Sakar S
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 May; 153(1-2):532-43. PubMed ID: 17913349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.