These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16900831)

  • 1. The field dependence/independence cognitive style does not control the spatial perception of elevation.
    Hudson TE; Li W; Matin L
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Apr; 68(3):377-92. PubMed ID: 16900831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent mechanisms produce visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and perceived visual pitch (PVP).
    Hudson TE; Li W; Matin L
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(19):2605-19. PubMed ID: 10958912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.
    Matin L; Fox CR
    Vision Res; 1989; 29(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 2773342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Light and dark adaptation of visually perceived eye level controlled by visual pitch.
    Matin L; Li W
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan; 57(1):84-104. PubMed ID: 7885810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Change in visually perceived eye level without change in perceived pitch.
    Li W; Matin L
    Perception; 1998; 27(5):553-72. PubMed ID: 10070555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visually perceived eye level is influenced identically by lines from erect and pitched planes.
    Li W; Matin L
    Perception; 1996; 25(7):831-52. PubMed ID: 8923552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of a stationary single line in darkness on the visual perception of eye level.
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 1994 Feb; 34(3):311-30. PubMed ID: 8160367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mislocalizations of visual elevation and visual vertical induced by visual pitch: the great circle model.
    Matin L; Li W
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1992 May; 656():242-65. PubMed ID: 1599147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influences of visual pitch and visual yaw on visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and straight ahead (VPSA) for erect and rolled-to-horizontal observers.
    Li W; Dallal N; Matin L
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2873-94. PubMed ID: 11701181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization.
    Li W; Matin L
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan; 57(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 7885809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural model for processing the influence of visual orientation on visually perceived eye level (VPEL).
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2845-72. PubMed ID: 11701180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Averaging and summation of influences on visually perceived eye level between two long lines differing in pitch or roll-tilt.
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 1999 Jan; 39(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 10326138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined influences of gravitoinertial force level and visual field pitch on visually perceived eye level.
    DiZio P; Li W; Lackner JR; Matin L
    J Vestib Res; 1997; 7(5):381-92. PubMed ID: 9376912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two wrongs make a right: linear increase of accuracy of visually-guided manual pointing, reaching, and height-matching with increase in hand-to-body distance.
    Li W; Matin L
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(5):533-50. PubMed ID: 15621173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of visual field dependence: comparison between the mechanical 3D rod-and-frame test developed by Oltman in 1968 with a 2D computer-based version.
    Isableu B; Gueguen M; Fourré B; Giraudet G; Amorim MA
    J Vestib Res; 2008; 18(5-6):239-47. PubMed ID: 19542598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial summation among coextensive and parallel line segments across wide separations (50 degrees): egocentric localization and the great circle model.
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(19):2577-98. PubMed ID: 7975297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why do pitched horizontal lines have such a small effect on visually perceived eye level?
    Post RB; Welch RB; Clark VD
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 May; 62(4):726-34. PubMed ID: 10883581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation.
    Matin L; Li W
    J Vestib Res; 1995; 5(6):499-518. PubMed ID: 8589859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of a visual frame and of low radial accelerations on the visually perceived eye level.
    Raphel C; Barraud PA; Koessler C; Cian C
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Aug; 58(6):906-14. PubMed ID: 8768185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in field independence influence the ability to determine accurate needle angles.
    Sheikh AY; Keehner M; Walker A; Chang PA; Burdon TA; Fann JI
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1804-10. PubMed ID: 24928261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.