These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16900867)

  • 41. Breast exposure: nationwide trends; a mammographic quality assurance program--results to date.
    Jensen JE; Butler PF
    Radiol Technol; 1978; 50(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 264140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Level of compliance with the radiation protection regulation--a survey among Norwegian hospitals and X-ray institutes.
    Friberg EG; Widmark A; Solberg M; Wøhni T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):223-6. PubMed ID: 21743081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessing the dose values received by patients during conventional radiography X-ray examinations and the technical condition of the equipment used for this purpose.
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Waśniewska E; Bogucka D; Magiera A
    Med Pr; 2014; 65(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 25902689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [The new x-ray ordinance].
    Schütz J
    Radiologe; 1988 Jan; 28(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 3344343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Consequences of changed regulations on the protection of the environment against the influence of the 50 Hz magnetic field].
    Szuba M
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 19603697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Faulkner K; Law J; Robson KJ
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Aug; 68(812):877-81. PubMed ID: 7551786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quality assurance in radiation therapy: clinical and physical aspects. Radiation protection.
    Morton RJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1984 Jun; 10 Suppl 1():115-8. PubMed ID: 6735786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Laws and regulations relating to the diagnostic use of radioactive substances. The present situation in West Germany].
    Kemmer W
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1990; 31():187-200. PubMed ID: 2336650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Quality assurance in ultrasound diagnostic equipment in West Germany. Experiences with current regulations].
    Trier HG
    Ultraschall Med; 1985 Oct; 6(5):255-64. PubMed ID: 3909397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Investigation of mean glandular dose versus compressed breast thickness relationship for mammography.
    Bor D; Tukel S; Olgar T; Toklu T; Aydin E; Akyol O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):160-4. PubMed ID: 18420560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Determination of total filtration and half attenuation layer in X-ray diagnostic units by relative radiation output].
    Vladimirov LV; Kozlov AA
    Med Tekh; 2004; (5):22-5. PubMed ID: 15568508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [The role of quality management in x-ray protection in cardiologic catheterization laboratory].
    Derkacz A; Andrzejak R
    Med Pr; 2005; 56(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 16457373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The regulation of mammography.
    Bassett LW
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1996 Oct; 17(5):415-23. PubMed ID: 8896108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Responsibilities of the authorities and officially designated inspectors including surveillance (the new x-ray ordinance)].
    Raum H
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Nov; 41(11):447-8. PubMed ID: 3194682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Automated x-ray exposure metering systems].
    Vladimirov LV; Kozlov AA; Ryzhkov AN; Muliarov MIa
    Med Tekh; 1990; (3):24-7. PubMed ID: 2388545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
    Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Radiation protection in mammography: possibilities of dose reduction].
    Säbel M; Willgeroth F; Aichinger H
    Rontgenpraxis; 1987 Feb; 40(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 3576374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.
    Faj D; Posedel D; Stimac D; Ivezic Z; Kasabasic M; Ivkovic A; Kubelka D; Ilakovac V; Brnic Z; Bjelac OC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Performance measurements of mammographic systems.
    Bor D; Akyol O; Olgar T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):165-9. PubMed ID: 18448439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.