BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

41 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16901006)

  • 1. The post-LLETZ cervical smear: influence of time interval from LLETZ.
    Hussein HY; Naik R; Tailor A; Edmondson RJ; Cross PA; Lopes Ade B; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(4):415-7. PubMed ID: 16901006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A decision analysis of practice patterns used in evaluating and treating abnormal Pap smears.
    Roland PY; Naumann RW; Alvarez RD; Kilgore LC; Partridge EE
    Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Oct; 59(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 7557619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A longitudinal 2-year follow-up of quality of life in women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear.
    Hellsten C; Sjöström K; Lindqvist PG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 19782459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
    Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of large-loop excision of the transformation zone in an inner-city population.
    Spitzer M; Chernys AE; Seltzer VL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):731-5. PubMed ID: 8414317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
    Luesley D; Downey G
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results.
    Bishop JW; Hartinger JS; Pawlick GF
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 9100753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of the assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women having large loop excision of the transformation zone.
    Ihonor AO; Cheung WY; Freites ON
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Mar; 19(2):169-71. PubMed ID: 15512263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) as an alternative to both local ablative and cone biopsy treatment: a series of 1000 patients.
    Hallam NF; West J; Harper C; Edwards A; Hope S; Merriman H; Pandher KS; Pinches P; Slade R; Marsh G
    J Gynecol Surg; 1993; 9(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 10146250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should smears in a colposcopy clinic be taken after the application of acetic acid?
    Griffiths M; Turner MJ; Partington CK; Soutter WP
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(3):324-6. PubMed ID: 2728786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Montz FJ; Monk BJ; Fowler JM; Nguyen L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):385-8. PubMed ID: 1495693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
    Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of uterine cervical cytology and biopsy results: indications and outcomes for colposcopy.
    Swinker M; Cutlip AC; Ogle D
    J Fam Pract; 1994 Jan; 38(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8289050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
    Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking a satisfactory cervical cytologic smear. Is it really an easy procedure?
    Bar-Am A; Niv J; Segal A
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1781-4. PubMed ID: 9390141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LLETZ Specimen Fragmentation: Impact on Diagnosis, Outcome, and Implications for Training.
    Bharathan R; Sagoo B; Subramaniam A; Larsen-Disney P; Fish A
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2013 Oct; 63(5):332-6. PubMed ID: 24431670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between type 3 excision of the transformation zone by straight wire excision of the transformation zone (SWETZ) and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ): a randomized study.
    Russomano F; Tristao MA; Côrtes R; de Camargo MJ
    BMC Womens Health; 2015; 15():12. PubMed ID: 25783647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
    Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.