BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16901063)

  • 1. [Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities; limitations and possibilities].
    ten Kate LP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Jul; 150(29):1608-12. PubMed ID: 16901063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Advances in rapid prenatal detection of fetal chromosome abnormalities].
    Wang J; Cui YX
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Apr; 16(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 20626168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis.
    Shaffer LG; Bui TH
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2007 Feb; 145C(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 17290441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal diagnosis by array-CGH.
    Rickman L; Fiegler H; Carter NP; Bobrow M
    Eur J Med Genet; 2005; 48(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 16179219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations.
    Le Caignec C; Boceno M; Saugier-Veber P; Jacquemont S; Joubert M; David A; Frebourg T; Rival JM
    J Med Genet; 2005 Feb; 42(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 15689449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities: from FISH to QF-PCR].
    Conrad B; Bena F; Dahoun-Hadorn S
    Rev Med Suisse; 2005 Mar; 1(11):785-8. PubMed ID: 15856851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gene dosage methods as diagnostic tools for the identification of chromosome abnormalities.
    Gouas L; Goumy C; Véronèse L; Tchirkov A; Vago P
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2008 Sep; 56(6):345-53. PubMed ID: 18513889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid methods for targeted prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies.
    Faas BH; Cirigliano V; Bui TH
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Apr; 16(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 21316319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the evolution of chromosome abnormalities in human embryos from Day 3 to 5 using CGH and FISH.
    Daphnis DD; Fragouli E; Economou K; Jerkovic S; Craft IL; Delhanty JD; Harper JC
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2008 Feb; 14(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 18222960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [New analytic methods provide answers regarding chromosome aberrations in 1-2 days].
    Bui TH; Blennow E; Nordenskjöld M
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Sep; 99(37):3601-2. PubMed ID: 12362544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
    Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic medicine in prenatal diagnosis.
    South ST; Chen Z; Brothman AR
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 51(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 18303500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) in detection of chromosomal abnormalities in children with acute leukaemia.
    Vranova V; Mentzlova D; Oltova A; Linkova V; Zezulkova D; Filkova H; Mendelova D; Sterba J; Kuglik P
    Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18190236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization in prenatal diagnosis of complex chromosomal abnormalities].
    Shen YY; Li J; Kong H; Wu HN; Wu Q; Ge YS; Huang XL; Zhou YL
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):529-32. PubMed ID: 19806574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience.
    Vialard F; Molina Gomes D; Leroy B; Quarello E; Escalona A; Le Sciellour C; Serazin V; Roume J; Ville Y; de Mazancourt P; Selva J
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 19521095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The application and significance in prenatal diagnosis using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization].
    Zhang WS; Chen QN; Wu XH; Liang QH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 26(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19350506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prenatal diagnosis of a 9q34.3 microdeletion by array-CGH in a fetus with an apparently balanced translocation.
    Simovich MJ; Yatsenko SA; Kang SH; Cheung SW; Dudek ME; Pursley A; Ward PA; Patel A; Lupski JR
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Dec; 27(12):1112-7. PubMed ID: 17849500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH.
    Bi W; Breman AM; Venable SF; Eng PA; Sahoo T; Lu XY; Patel A; Beaudet AL; Cheung SW; White LD
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Oct; 28(10):943-9. PubMed ID: 18792925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Copy-number changes in prenatal diagnosis.
    Strassberg M; Fruhman G; Van den Veyver IB
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2011 Jul; 11(6):579-92. PubMed ID: 21745012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.