These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16901510)
1. Selection for mutational robustness in finite populations. Forster R; Adami C; Wilke CO J Theor Biol; 2006 Nov; 243(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 16901510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of recombination on the neutral evolution of genetic robustness. Szöllosi GJ; Derényi I Math Biosci; 2008; 214(1-2):58-62. PubMed ID: 18490032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of population size and mutation rate on the evolution of mutational robustness. Elena SF; Wilke CO; Ofria C; Lenski RE Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):666-74. PubMed ID: 17348929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compensatory neutral mutations and the evolution of RNA. Higgs PG Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):91-101. PubMed ID: 9720274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neutral evolution of proteins: The superfunnel in sequence space and its relation to mutational robustness. Noirel J; Simonson T J Chem Phys; 2008 Nov; 129(18):185104. PubMed ID: 19045432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability. Jones AG; Arnold SJ; Bürger R Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):727-45. PubMed ID: 17439608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Population evolution on a multiplicative single-peak fitness landscape. Woodcock G; Higgs PG J Theor Biol; 1996 Mar; 179(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 8733432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The opportunity for canalization and the evolution of genetic networks. Proulx SR; Phillips PC Am Nat; 2005 Feb; 165(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 15729647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards a theory of evolutionary adaptation. Hartl DL; Taubes CH Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):525-33. PubMed ID: 9720296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recombination and the evolution of mutational robustness. Gardner A; Kalinka AT J Theor Biol; 2006 Aug; 241(4):707-15. PubMed ID: 16487979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The build up of mutation-selection- drift balance in laboratory Drosophila populations. García-Dorado A; Avila V; Sánchez-Molano E; Manrique A; López-Fanjul C Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):653-65. PubMed ID: 17348928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Degeneracy: a design principle for achieving robustness and evolvability. Whitacre J; Bender A J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):143-53. PubMed ID: 19925810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unifying evolutionary dynamics: from individual stochastic processes to macroscopic models. Champagnat N; Ferrière R; Méléard S Theor Popul Biol; 2006 May; 69(3):297-321. PubMed ID: 16460772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From fitness landscapes to seascapes: non-equilibrium dynamics of selection and adaptation. Mustonen V; Lässig M Trends Genet; 2009 Mar; 25(3):111-9. PubMed ID: 19232770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive evolution on neutral networks. Wilke CO Bull Math Biol; 2001 Jul; 63(4):715-30. PubMed ID: 11497165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection for fitness versus selection for robustness in RNA secondary structure folding. Wilke CO Evolution; 2001 Dec; 55(12):2412-20. PubMed ID: 11831657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A maximum principle for the mutation-selection equilibrium of nucleotide sequences. Garske T; Grimm U Bull Math Biol; 2004 May; 66(3):397-421. PubMed ID: 15006441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]