These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16901732)

  • 21. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new positioning device for extraoral radiography with conventional dental x-ray machines.
    Schiff TG; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jun; 59(6):659-61. PubMed ID: 3859829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
    Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survey of radiographic requirements and techniques.
    Farman AG; Shawkat AH
    J Dent Educ; 1981 Sep; 45(9):581-4. PubMed ID: 6943176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs.
    Nielsen PM; Weber HP; zen Ruffinen S; Brecx M; Joss A; Lang NP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 2692154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of radiographic technique using a new customized film holder for dental implant assessment.
    Aparecida de Mattias Sartori I; da Silveira Junior CD; Fontão FN; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M
    Implant Dent; 2014 Feb; 23(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 24384739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Salvaging dark dental radiographs.
    Winstanley TD
    Dent Update; 1996; 23(6):246, 249. PubMed ID: 9084254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Quality control of intra-oral radiographs].
    Huysmans MC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Dec; 102(12):480-3. PubMed ID: 11836817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative study of radiographic quality with five periapical techniques in general dental practice.
    Rushton VE; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 8181658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nasal passages of Göttingen minipigs from the neonatal period to young adult.
    Kuper CF; Ernst H; van Oostrum LC; Rittinghausen S; Penninks AH; Ganderup NC; Wolterbeek AP
    Toxicol Pathol; 2012 Jun; 40(4):656-66. PubMed ID: 22301951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.
    De Smet E; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Naert I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 12058265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal parameters for lateral oblique radiographs of rat mandibles.
    Mahl CR; Fontanella V
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 18460576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [High-contrast resolution of film-screen systems in oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Kaeppler G; Reinert S
    Rofo; 2007 Nov; 179(11):1145-51. PubMed ID: 17805997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Techniques for improving dental radiographs.
    Cooley RL; Lubow RM
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1985; 64(6):9-13. PubMed ID: 3867750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.