443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16901745)
1. Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility.
Roskies A
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):419-23. PubMed ID: 16901745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How does the neuroscience of decision making bear on our understanding of moral responsibility and free will?
Roskies AL
Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2012 Dec; 22(6):1022-6. PubMed ID: 22717529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [On the necessity to distinguishing judgment from subjective choice in the cognitive neuroscience of morality].
Tassy S
Med Sci (Paris); 2011 Oct; 27(10):889-94. PubMed ID: 22027427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The will: from metaphysical freedom to normative functionalism.
Felthous AR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 18354118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knowing good and doing good.
Gaylin W
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):36-41. PubMed ID: 8089010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Neuroscientific Prediction and the Intrusion of Intuitive Metaphysics.
Rose D; Buckwalter W; Nichols S
Cogn Sci; 2017 Mar; 41(2):482-502. PubMed ID: 26452629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental philosophy and the problem of free will.
Nichols S
Science; 2011 Mar; 331(6023):1401-3. PubMed ID: 21415346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: a test of the expertise defense.
Schulz E; Cokely ET; Feltz A
Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1722-31. PubMed ID: 21596586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural Compatibilism, Indeterminism, and Intrusive Metaphysics.
Nadelhoffer T; Rose D; Buckwalter W; Nichols S
Cogn Sci; 2020 Aug; 44(8):e12873. PubMed ID: 33145820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental philosophy of actual and counterfactual free will intuitions.
Feltz A
Conscious Cogn; 2015 Nov; 36():113-30. PubMed ID: 26126174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rationality, responsibility, and brain function.
Buller T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Apr; 19(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 20226103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental philosophy.
Knobe J; Buckwalter W; Nichols S; Robbins P; Sarkissian H; Sommers T
Annu Rev Psychol; 2012; 63():81-99. PubMed ID: 21801019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The challenges of neuroethics.
Reichlin M
Funct Neurol; 2007; 22(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 18182130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. It's OK if 'my brain made me do it': people's intuitions about free will and neuroscientific prediction.
Nahmias E; Shepard J; Reuter S
Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):502-16. PubMed ID: 25195077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aggression, science, and law: The origins framework. Introduction.
Victoroff J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(4):189-97. PubMed ID: 19540592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Judgments about moral responsibility and determinism in patients with behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: still compatibilists.
Cova F; Bertoux M; Bourgeois-Gironde S; Dubois B
Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):851-64. PubMed ID: 22409859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A neuroscientific approach to normative judgment in law and justice.
Goodenough OR; Prehn K
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2004 Nov; 359(1451):1709-26. PubMed ID: 15590612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: freedom and function.
Buchanan A
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 18354119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neuroscience and the law: philosophical differences and practical constraints.
Martell DA
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 19267425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The contribution of neuroscience to the understanding of moral behavior].
Slachevsky A; Silva JR; Prenafeta ML; Novoa F
Rev Med Chil; 2009 Mar; 137(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 19621186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
