124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1690233)
21. Variation in distances among teats of Holstein cows: implications for automated milking.
Miller RH; Fulton LA; Erez B; Williams WF; Pearson RE
J Dairy Sci; 1995 Jul; 78(7):1456-62. PubMed ID: 7593838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Short communication: Teat skin pH.
Fox LK; Oura LY; Ames CR
J Dairy Sci; 2003 Dec; 86(12):3951-2. PubMed ID: 14740831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Examination of a novel wax teat bougie for treatment of wounds in the papillary lactiferous sinus of dairy cows with special regard to endoscopic documentation of mucosal reactions compared with conventional teat bougies and a teat cannula].
Seeh C; Schlenstedt R; Stengel KH; Geishauser T; Failing K; Zschök M; Bostedt H
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1997 Aug; 104(8):277-84. PubMed ID: 9324452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cow-related risk factors for milk leakage.
Klaas IC; Enevoldsen C; Ersbøll AK; Tölle U
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jan; 88(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 15591375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Histologic features and results of virus isolation tests of tissues obtained from teat lesions that developed in dairy cattle during winter.
Timms LL; Van der Maaten MJ; Kehrli ME; Ackermann MR
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1998 Sep; 213(6):862-5. PubMed ID: 9743729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ultrasonographic measurement of the bovine teat: breed differences, and the significance of the measurements for udder health.
Klein D; Flöck M; Khol JL; Franz S; Stüger HP; Baumgartner W
J Dairy Res; 2005 Aug; 72(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 16174360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Protection against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy cows using a bismuth-based teat seal containing the bacteriocin, lacticin 3147.
Twomey DP; Wheelock AI; Flynn J; Meaney WJ; Hill C; Ross RP
J Dairy Sci; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1981-8. PubMed ID: 11003227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adherence and efficacy of an external teat sealant to prevent new intramammary infections in the dry period.
Lim GH; Leslie KE; Kelton DF; Duffield TF; Timms LL; Dingwell RT
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1289-300. PubMed ID: 17297105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cleanliness scores as indicator of Klebsiella exposure in dairy cows.
Munoz MA; Bennett GJ; Ahlström C; Griffiths HM; Schukken YH; Zadoks RN
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Oct; 91(10):3908-16. PubMed ID: 18832213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prevalence of chronic teat-end lesions and their relationship to intramammary infection in 22 herds of dairy cattle.
Sieber RL; Farnsworth RJ
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1981 Jun; 178(12):1263-7. PubMed ID: 7275762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative evaluation of SIMPL silicone implants and NIT natural teat inserts to keep the teat canal patent after surgery.
Querengässer J; Geishauser T; Querengässer K; Bruckmaier R; Fehlings K
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jul; 85(7):1732-7. PubMed ID: 12201524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Antibody-containing cells and specialised epithelial cells in the bovine teat.
Collins RA; Parsons KR; Bland AP
Res Vet Sci; 1986 Jul; 41(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 3764101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of teatcup liner design on teat characteristics and udder health.
Bakke H; Binde M
Nord Vet Med; 1984; 36(3-4):117-23. PubMed ID: 6539909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Blood flow to the distal part of the teat (mammary papilla) of lactating dairy cows.
Jankus EF; Baumann LE
Am J Vet Res; 1986 Feb; 47(2):283-5. PubMed ID: 3754101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiographic method for anatomic study of the teat canal: changes between milking periods.
McDonald JS
Am J Vet Res; 1975 Aug; 36(08):1241-2. PubMed ID: 1155840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of postmilking teat antisepsis on teat canal infections in lactating dairy cows.
Nickerson SC; Watts JL; Boddie RL; Ray CH
J Dairy Sci; 1990 Feb; 73(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 2184176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Keratin and S100 calcium-binding proteins are major constituents of the bovine teat canal lining.
Smolenski GA; Cursons RT; Hine BC; Wheeler TT
Vet Res; 2015 Sep; 46():113. PubMed ID: 26407704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The prevalence of teat canal infections in lactating dairy cows as determined from foremilk and teat canal swab samples.
du Preez JH
J S Afr Vet Assoc; 1986 Dec; 57(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 3572953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Some observations on the morphology of the bovine teat canal (Ductus papillaris mammae).
van der Merwe NJ
J S Afr Vet Assoc; 1985 Mar; 56(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 3999102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigations on teat canal length in teats with milk flow disturbances.
Geishauser T; Querengässer K
J Dairy Sci; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1976-80. PubMed ID: 11003226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
