These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Sensorimotor effects on central space representation: prism adaptation influences haptic and visual representations in normal subjects. Girardi M; McIntosh RD; Michel C; Vallar G; Rossetti Y Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1477-87. PubMed ID: 15246285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation. Nicholls ME; Kamer A; Loftus AM Exp Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 191(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 18663435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect. Sarri M; Greenwood R; Kalra L; Driver J Cortex; 2011 Mar; 47(3):353-66. PubMed ID: 20171612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Left-deviating prism adaptation in left neglect patient: reflexions on a negative result. Luauté J; Jacquin-Courtois S; O'Shea J; Christophe L; Rode G; Boisson D; Rossetti Y Neural Plast; 2012; 2012():718604. PubMed ID: 23050168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Neglect and prism adaptation: a new therapeutic tool for spatial cognition disorders. Rode G; Klos T; Courtois-Jacquin S; Rossetti Y; Pisella L Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2006; 24(4-6):347-56. PubMed ID: 17119309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Amelioration of right spatial neglect after visuo-motor adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms. Bultitude JH; Rafal RD Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):404-6. PubMed ID: 19589511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Through a prism darkly: re-evaluating prisms and neglect. Striemer CL; Danckert JA Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Jul; 14(7):308-16. PubMed ID: 20444640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Neglect rehabilitation by prism adaptation: different procedures have different impacts. Làdavas E; Bonifazi S; Catena L; Serino A Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):1136-1145. PubMed ID: 21310165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prism adaptation changes perceptual awareness for chimeric visual objects but not for chimeric faces in spatial neglect after right-hemisphere stroke. Sarri M; Kalra L; Greenwood R; Driver J Neurocase; 2006 Jun; 12(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 16801148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prism Adaptation Modulates Connectivity of the Intraparietal Sulcus with Multiple Brain Networks. Schintu S; Freedberg M; Gotts SJ; Cunningham CA; Alam ZM; Shomstein S; Wassermann EM Cereb Cortex; 2020 Jul; 30(9):4747-4758. PubMed ID: 32313949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A comparison of prism adaptation with terminal versus concurrent exposure on sensorimotor changes and spatial neglect. Facchin A; Bultitude JH; Mornati G; Peverelli M; Daini R Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2020 May; 30(4):613-640. PubMed ID: 29914300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. I. Effects of behavioral context. Bowman EM; Brown VJ; Kertzman C; Schwarz U; Robinson DL J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):431-43. PubMed ID: 8360720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Parietal disruption impairs reflexive spatial attention within and between sensory modalities. Chambers CD; Payne JM; Mattingley JB Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1715-24. PubMed ID: 17280691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effects of prism adaptation on motor-intentional spatial bias in neglect. Fortis P; Chen P; Goedert KM; Barrett AM Neuroreport; 2011 Oct; 22(14):700-5. PubMed ID: 21817924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prism adaptation influences perception but not attention: evidence from antisaccades. Nijboer T; Vree A; Dijkerman C; Van der Stigchel S Neuroreport; 2010 Mar; 21(5):386-9. PubMed ID: 20186107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]