These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16903491)

  • 21. The sensitivity of response rate to the rate of variable-interval reinforcement for pigeons and rats: a review.
    Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 16156139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The value hypothesis and acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.
    Grace RC
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Feb; 30(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 12017965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.
    Williams AM; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 10220929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reinforcement omission in concurrent fixed-interval and random-interval schedules.
    Ishii T; Sakagami T
    Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17275211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Choice and conditioned reinforcement.
    Fantino E; Freed D; Preston RA; Williams WA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 2037826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Induced attack during fixed-ratio and matched-time schedules of food presentation.
    Kupfer AS; Allen R; Malagodi EF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18338674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11394485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stimulus generalization of behavioral history: Interspecies generality and persistence of generalization gradients.
    Okouchi H; Nakamura S; Watanabe S; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Jul; 116(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 34105175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of differences in interreinforcer intervals between past and current schedules on fixed-interval responding.
    Okouchi H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 12696741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1979 Oct; 5(4):379-96. PubMed ID: 528894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Elicited responding in chain schedules.
    Dougherty DM; Lewis P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):475-87. PubMed ID: 1774540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Choice between delayed reinforcers and fixed-ratio schedules requiring forceful responding.
    Mazur JE; Kralik JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):175-87. PubMed ID: 2299287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of free food deliveries and temporal contiguity on choice under concurrent-chain schedules.
    Scoones C; Hucks A; McLean AP; Grace RC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Aug; 16(4):736-41. PubMed ID: 19648461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.
    Spetch ML; Belke TW; Barnet RC; Dunn R; Pierce WD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 2324664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Travel time and concurrent-schedule choice: retrospective versus prospective control.
    Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jan; 73(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 10682340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The resistance to change of observing.
    Shahan TA; Magee A; Dobberstein A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):273-93. PubMed ID: 14964708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.
    Pliskoff SS; Shull RL; Gollub LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 5660708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Disruption of temporally organized behavior by morphine.
    Knealing TW; Schaal DW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Mar; 77(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 11936249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.