318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16903492)
1. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
Aparicio CF; Baum WM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
Krägeloh CU; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choice in a variable environment: visit patterns in the dynamics of choice.
Baum WM; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):85-127. PubMed ID: 15113135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preference pulses and the win-stay, fix-and-sample model of choice.
Hachiga Y; Sakagami T; Silberberg A
J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 26420769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity, changeover responses, and choice in transition.
Jiménez AA; Aparicio CF
Behav Processes; 2009 Sep; 82(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19615608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
Davison M; Baum WM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.
Landon J; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):207-34. PubMed ID: 11394487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
Davison M; Baum WM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
Beeby E; Alsop B
J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers.
Mazur JE; Biondi DR
J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 21541170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
Elliffe D; Davison M
Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of changeover delays on local choice.
Gomes-Ng S; Landon J; Elliffe D; Bensemann J; Cowie S
Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial associative memory: a possible species difference in rats and pigeons.
Thorpe CM; Wilkie DM
Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 16112815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamical concurrent schedules.
Palya WL; Allan RW
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 12696738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
Mazur JE
Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 17343994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
