These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16903493)

  • 1. The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as propioceptive samples in pigeons.
    García A; Benjumea S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 16903493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Errorless learning of a conditional temporal discrimination.
    Arantes J; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 21541167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.
    da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):395-413. PubMed ID: 21119853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons.
    Williams DA; Butler MM; Overmier JB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2303792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pigeons' spatial memory: III. Effect of distractors on delayed matching of key location.
    Wilkie DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 6631313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conditional discrimination with ambiguous stimuli.
    Meltzer D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Mar; 39(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 6842128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conjoint control of performance in conditional discriminations by successive and simultaneous stimuli.
    White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Mar; 45(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 3958662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.
    Alsop B; Jones BM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):311-31. PubMed ID: 18540217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the discriminability of stimulus duration.
    McCarthy D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):187-211. PubMed ID: 7365407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control of pigeons' matching-to-sample performance by differential sample response requirements.
    Hogan DE; Zentall TR; Pace G
    Am J Psychol; 1983; 96(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 6859346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pigeons' spatial memory: factors affecting delayed matching of key location.
    Wilkie DM; Summers RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Jan; 37(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 7057128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Color preference in pigeons: stimulus intensity and reinforcement contingency effects in the avoidance of blue stimuli.
    Biederman GB; McDonald KG; Heighington GA; Vanayan M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 3361267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correspondence as conditional stimulus control: insights from experiments with pigeons.
    Lattal KA; Doepke KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):127-44. PubMed ID: 11421307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible conditional discrimination learning: Pigeons can learn to select the correct comparison stimulus, reject the incorrect comparison, or both.
    Peng DN; Mueller PM; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(4):445-454. PubMed ID: 34472951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli: II. Effects of changes in stimulus probability.
    Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 429958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioral research in pigeons with ARENA: an automated remote environmental navigation apparatus.
    Leising KJ; Garlick D; Parenteau M; Blaisdell AP
    Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 19429204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention, the presolution period, and choice accuracy in pigeons.
    Chase S; Schupak C; Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2012 Mar; 89(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22138233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oddity learning in the pigeon as a function of the number of incorrect alternatives.
    Zentall TR; Hogan DE; Edwards CA; Hearst E
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Jul; 6(3):278-99. PubMed ID: 7391753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When is a choice not a choice? Pigeons fail to inhibit incorrect responses on a go/no-go midsession reversal task.
    McMillan N; Sturdy CB; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 25915749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independence of stimulus discriminability from absolute rate of reinforcement in a signal-detection procedure.
    McCarthy D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 May; 37(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 7097151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.