177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16903989)
1. Are Australians able to access new medicines on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme in a more or less timely manner? An analysis of pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee recommendations, 1999-2003.
Wonder MJ; Neville AM; Parsons R
Value Health; 2006; 9(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 16903989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and implications for paediatric prescribing.
Sinha Y; Brien JA; Craig JC
J Paediatr Child Health; 2009 Jun; 45(6):351-7. PubMed ID: 19490409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicine reimbursement recommendations in Canada, Australia, and Scotland.
Lexchin J; Mintzes B
Am J Manag Care; 2008 Sep; 14(9):581-8. PubMed ID: 18778173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicines and the media: news reports of medicines recommended for government reimbursement in Australia.
Robertson J; Walkom EJ; Bevan MD; Newby DA
BMC Public Health; 2013 May; 13():489. PubMed ID: 23687910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delays in access to affordable medicines: putting policy into perspective.
Pearce A; van Gool K; Haywood P; Haas M
Aust Health Rev; 2012 Nov; 36(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 23062753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of PBAC submissions and outcomes for medicines (2010-2018).
Lybrand S; Wonder M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Jun; 36(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 32524923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are cancer drugs less likely to be recommended for listing by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee in Australia?
Chim L; Kelly PJ; Salkeld G; Stockler MR
Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):463-75. PubMed ID: 20465315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based decision-making within Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme.
Lopert R
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Jul; 60():1-13. PubMed ID: 19639714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is it all about price? Why requests for government subsidy of anticancer drugs were rejected in Australia.
Karikios DJ; Chim L; Martin A; Nagrial A; Howard K; Salkeld G; Stockler MR
Intern Med J; 2017 Apr; 47(4):400-407. PubMed ID: 27928875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS IN AUSTRALIA.
Turkstra E; Bettington E; Donohue ML; Mervin MC
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(4):521-528. PubMed ID: 28703092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Access to new medicines in New Zealand compared to Australia.
Wonder M; Milne R
N Z Med J; 2011 Nov; 124(1346):12-28. PubMed ID: 22143849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What impact does 'conventional' economic evaluation have on patient access to new orphan medicines? A comparative study of their reimbursement in Australia (2005-2012).
Wonder M; Chin G
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015; 15(5):843-50. PubMed ID: 25938794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the implications of a fixed budget for new medicines: a study of reimbursement of new medicines in Australia and New Zealand.
Taylor C; Wonder M
Aust Health Rev; 2015 Sep; 39(4):455-461. PubMed ID: 25751688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.
Clement FM; Harris A; Li JJ; Yong K; Lee KM; Manns BJ
JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(13):1437-43. PubMed ID: 19809025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uptake of new medicines in New Zealand: evidence of a waiting list.
Barber JM; Sheehy KP
N Z Med J; 2015 Apr; 128(1412):10-20. PubMed ID: 25899488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the Quality of the Clinical Evidence in Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: Fit for Purpose?
Wonder M; Dunlop S
Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 26091601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of sponsor hearings on health technology assessment decision making.
Flowers M; Lybrand S; Wonder M
Aust Health Rev; 2020 Apr; 44(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 31072455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Governments Need Better Guidance to Maximise Value for Money: The Case of Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee.
Carter D; Vogan A; Haji Ali Afzali H
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 14(4):401-407. PubMed ID: 26818196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health Technology Assessment in Australia: The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee and Medical Services Advisory Committee.
Kim H; Byrnes J; Goodall S;
Value Health Reg Issues; 2021 May; 24():6-11. PubMed ID: 33429153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The subsidy of pharmaceuticals in Australia: processes and challenges.
Sansom L
Aust Health Rev; 2004 Nov; 28(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 15527399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
