These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16904133)
1. Using the tangle: a consistent construction of phylogenetic distance matrices for quartets. Sumner JG; Jarvis PD Math Biosci; 2006 Nov; 204(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 16904133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistics of the log-det estimator. Massingham T; Goldman N Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):2277-85. PubMed ID: 17703055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scoredist: a simple and robust protein sequence distance estimator. Sonnhammer EL; Hollich V BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():108. PubMed ID: 15857510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward extracting all phylogenetic information from matrices of evolutionary distances. Roch S Science; 2010 Mar; 327(5971):1376-9. PubMed ID: 20223986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards optimal distance functions for stochastic substitution models. Gronau I; Moran S; Yavneh I J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 19501101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phylogenetic distances for neighbour dependent substitution processes. Falconnet M Math Biosci; 2010 Apr; 224(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 20064534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast computation of distance estimators. Elias I; Lagergren J BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8():89. PubMed ID: 17355623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QNet: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks from weighted quartets. Grünewald S; Forslund K; Dress A; Moulton V Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):532-8. PubMed ID: 17119010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying evolutionary trees and substitution parameters for the general Markov model with invariable sites. Allman ES; Rhodes JA Math Biosci; 2008 Jan; 211(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 17964612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Markov invariants for phylogenetic rate matrices derived from embedded submodels. Jarvis PD; Sumner JG IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(3):828-36. PubMed ID: 22331860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuous and tractable models for the variation of evolutionary rates. Lepage T; Lawi S; Tupper P; Bryant D Math Biosci; 2006 Feb; 199(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 16406009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhancing the quality of phylogenetic analysis using fuzzy hidden Markov model alignments. Collyda C; Diplaris S; Mitkas P; Maglaveras N; Pappas C Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1245-9. PubMed ID: 17911914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phylogeny reconstruction: increasing the accuracy of pairwise distance estimation using Bayesian inference of evolutionary rates. Ninio M; Privman E; Pupko T; Friedman N Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e136-41. PubMed ID: 17237082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel feature-based method for whole genome phylogenetic analysis without alignment: application to HEV genotyping and subtyping. Liu Z; Meng J; Sun X Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2008 Apr; 368(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 18230342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The challenge of constructing large phylogenetic trees. Sanderson MJ; Driskell AC Trends Plant Sci; 2003 Aug; 8(8):374-9. PubMed ID: 12927970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new criterion and method for amino acid classification. Kosiol C; Goldman N; Buttimore NH J Theor Biol; 2004 May; 228(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 15064085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]