These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16904181)

  • 1. SWIFT explorations of age differences in eye movements during reading.
    Laubrock J; Kliegl R; Engbert R
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2006; 30(6):872-84. PubMed ID: 16904181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mindless reading revisited: an analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control.
    Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):322-36. PubMed ID: 19026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.
    Engbert R; Nuthmann A; Richter EM; Kliegl R
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):777-813. PubMed ID: 16262468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006).
    Rayner K; Pollatsek A; Drieghe D; Slattery TJ; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):520-9; discussion 530-7. PubMed ID: 17696697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eye-movement models for arithmetic and reading performance.
    Suppes P
    Rev Oculomot Res; 1990; 4():455-77. PubMed ID: 7492535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text.
    Schad DJ; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2600-16. PubMed ID: 20719240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
    White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The IOVP effect in mindless reading: experiment and modeling.
    Nuthmann A; Engbert R; Kliegl R
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):990-1002. PubMed ID: 17184806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading.
    McDonald SA; Carpenter RH; Shillcock RC
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):814-40. PubMed ID: 16262469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing.
    Engbert R; Longtin A; Kliegl R
    Vision Res; 2002 Mar; 42(5):621-36. PubMed ID: 11853779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision and metrics of refixations in reading isolated words.
    Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Doré-Mazars K
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):2009-17. PubMed ID: 15149834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
    Kliegl R; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 16478314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1155():147-62. PubMed ID: 17499223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):954-9. PubMed ID: 16262491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using reinforcement learning to understand the emergence of "intelligent" eye-movement behavior during reading.
    Reichle ED; Laurent PA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Apr; 113(2):390-408. PubMed ID: 16637766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control.
    Pollatsek A; Reichle ED; Rayner K
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Feb; 52(1):1-56. PubMed ID: 16289074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.