238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16904488)
1. Three-dimensional vertebral motions produced by mechanical force spinal manipulation.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Moore RJ; Gunzburg R; Harrison DE; Harrison DD
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006; 29(6):425-36. PubMed ID: 16904488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part I. Vertebral motion.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Gunzburg R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(9):567-78. PubMed ID: 14673406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study.
Nathan M; Keller TS
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Sep; 17(7):431-41. PubMed ID: 7989876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased multiaxial lumbar motion responses during multiple-impulse mechanical force manually assisted spinal manipulation.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Moore RJ; Gunzburg R; Harrison DE
Chiropr Osteopat; 2006 Apr; 14():6. PubMed ID: 16597343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of mechanical force of manually assisted chiropractic adjusting instruments.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Black P; Normand MC; Harrison DE; Harrison DD
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005; 28(6):414-22. PubMed ID: 16096041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Harrison DE; Moore RJ; Gunzburg R; Harrison DD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 16378668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a noninvasive dynamic spinal stiffness assessment methodology in an animal model of intervertebral disc degeneration.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Moore RJ; Harrison DE; Gunzburg R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1900-5. PubMed ID: 19680098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part II. Neurophysiological response.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Gunzburg R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(9):579-91. PubMed ID: 14673407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical and neurophysiological responses to spinal manipulation in patients with lumbar radiculopathy.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Gunzburg R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jan; 27(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 14739869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stiffness and neuromuscular reflex response of the human spine to posteroanterior manipulative thrusts in patients with low back pain.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Oct; 24(8):489-500. PubMed ID: 11677547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo transient vibration assessment of the normal human thoracolumbar spine.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Fuhr AW
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Oct; 23(8):521-30. PubMed ID: 11050608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A rigid body model of the dynamic posteroanterior motion response of the human lumbar spine.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Oct; 25(8):485-96. PubMed ID: 12381970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Active trunk extensor contributions to dynamic posteroanterior lumbar spinal stiffness.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 May; 27(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15148461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neurophysiologic response to intraoperative lumbosacral spinal manipulation.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Gunzburg R; Vandeputte K; Fuhr AW
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Sep; 23(7):447-57. PubMed ID: 11004648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Movements of vertebrae during manipulative thrusts to unembalmed human cadavers.
Gál J; Herzog W; Kawchuk G; Conway PJ; Zhang YT
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Jan; 20(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 9004120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electromyographic reflex responses to mechanical force, manually assisted spinal manipulative therapy.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(10):1117-24. PubMed ID: 11413422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the force and frequency characteristics of the activator adjusting instrument: effectiveness as a mechanical impedance measurement tool.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Fuhr AW
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1999 Feb; 22(2):75-86. PubMed ID: 10073622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of piezoelectric accelerometers measuring displacement of a spinal adjusting instrument.
Fuhr AW; Smith DB
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1986 Mar; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 3701223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of a mechanical pain stimulus on erector spinae activity before and after a spinal manipulation in patients with back pain: a preliminary investigation.
Lehman GJ; Vernon H; McGill SM
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001; 24(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 11514817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immature sheep spines are more flexible than mature spines: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Clarke EC; Appleyard RC; Bilston LE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2970-9. PubMed ID: 18091489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
