125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16904527)
1. Limitations of the planning organ at risk volume (PRV) concept.
Stroom JC; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Sep; 66(1):279-86. PubMed ID: 16904527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins.
Suzuki M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Hashiba H; Koike R; Kanamori S; Shibata T
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 16564594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined recipe for clinical target volume and planning target volume margins.
Stroom J; Gilhuijs K; Vieira S; Chen W; Salguero J; Moser E; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):708-14. PubMed ID: 24113058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of geometric uncertainties on dose distribution during intensity modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer: the need for a planning target volume and a planning organ-at-risk volume.
Ballivy O; Parker W; Vuong T; Shenouda G; Patrocinio H
Curr Oncol; 2006 Jun; 13(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 17576450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spinal cord planning risk volumes for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head-and-neck cancer.
Breen SL; Craig T; Bayley A; O'Sullivan B; Kim J; Jaffray D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):321-5. PubMed ID: 16377418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of uncertainty-based stopping criteria for monte carlo calculations of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and arc therapy patient dose distributions.
Vanderstraeten B; Olteanu AM; Reynaert N; Leal A; De Neve W; Thierens H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):628-37. PubMed ID: 17869677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image-guided radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: geometrical uncertainty of the heart.
Topolnjak R; Borst GR; Nijkamp J; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(4):e647-55. PubMed ID: 22270162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Margins for treatment planning of proton therapy.
Thomas SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1491-501. PubMed ID: 16510958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the influence of setup uncertainties on treatment planning for focal liver tumors.
Balter JM; Brock KK; Lam KL; Tatro D; Dawson LA; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):610-4. PubMed ID: 16095848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of geometrical uncertainties on 3D CRT and IMRT dose distributions for lung cancer treatment.
Schwarz M; Van der Geer J; Van Herk M; Lebesque JV; Mijnheer BJ; Damen EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1260-9. PubMed ID: 16798418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose calculations accounting for breathing motion in stereotactic lung radiotherapy based on 4D-CT and the internal target volume.
Admiraal MA; Schuring D; Hurkmans CW
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18082905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Margins for geometric uncertainty around organs at risk in radiotherapy.
McKenzie A; van Herk M; Mijnheer B
Radiother Oncol; 2002 Mar; 62(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 12175561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of MLC leaf width and PTV margin on the treatment planning of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMSRS) or radiotherapy (IMSRT).
Chang J; Yenice KM; Jiang K; Hunt M; Narayana A
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 19410139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose-volume population histogram: a new tool for evaluating plans whilst considering geometrical uncertainties.
Nguyen TB; Hoole AC; Burnet NG; Thomas SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):935-47. PubMed ID: 19147901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental evaluation of the impact of different head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning techniques on doses to the skin and shallow targets.
Court LE; Tishler RB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):607-13. PubMed ID: 17869674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
