1535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16904738)
1. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration.
Le Guéhennec L; Soueidan A; Layrolle P; Amouriq Y
Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):844-54. PubMed ID: 16904738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of osseointegration of titanium implants with acid-etched surfaces and different biomolecular coatings.
Mueller CK; Thorwarth M; Schmidt M; Schlegel KA; Schultze-Mosgau S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):726-36. PubMed ID: 21441047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M
J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The role of surface roughness in promoting osteointegration].
Nasatzky E; Gultchin J; Schwartz Z
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2003 Jul; 20(3):8-19, 98. PubMed ID: 14515625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biofunctionalization of titanium implants with a biomimetic active peptide (P-15) promotes early osseointegration.
Lutz R; Srour S; Nonhoff J; Weisel T; Damien CJ; Schlegel KA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):726-34. PubMed ID: 20636727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of surface chemistry on the rate of osseointegration of sintered porous-surfaced Ti-6Al-4V implants.
Taché A; Gan L; Deporter D; Pilliar RM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 14982351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of BMP-2 and its mode of delivery on the osteoconductivity of implant surfaces during the early phase of osseointegration.
Liu Y; Enggist L; Kuffer AF; Buser D; Hunziker EB
Biomaterials; 2007 Jun; 28(16):2677-86. PubMed ID: 17321590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone-implant contact at calcium phosphate-coated and porous titanium oxide (TiUnite)-modified oral implants.
Xiropaidis AV; Qahash M; Lim WH; Shanaman RH; Rohrer MD; Wikesjö UM; Hall J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 16164458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo low-density bone apposition on different implant surface materials.
Braceras I; De Maeztu MA; Alava JI; Gay-Escoda C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 19200692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of combined delivery of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor 165 from biomimetic calcium-phosphate-coated implants on osseointegration.
Ramazanoglu M; Lutz R; Ergun C; von Wilmowsky C; Nkenke E; Schlegel KA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1433-9. PubMed ID: 21418332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep.
Langhoff JD; Voelter K; Scharnweber D; Schnabelrauch M; Schlottig F; Hefti T; Kalchofner K; Nuss K; von Rechenberg B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 18977118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
