These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16905055)

  • 1. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods.
    Arman A; Cehreli SB; Ozel E; Arhun N; Cetinşahin A; Soyman M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):131.e7-14. PubMed ID: 16905055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various post-stripping polishing methods: an in vitro study.
    Gupta P; Gupta N; Patel N; Gupta R; Sandhu GS; Naik C
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 23304974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction.
    Meredith L; Farella M; Lowrey S; Cannon RD; Mei L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):750-757. PubMed ID: 28364899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment.
    Ozer T; Başaran G; Kama JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 20197174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pilot investigation of enamel reduction procedures.
    Rossouw PE; Tortorella A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jun; 69(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 12787476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate application after interproximal stripping on enamel surface: An in-vivo study.
    Bayram M; Kusgoz A; Yesilyurt C; Nur M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):167-173. PubMed ID: 28024772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozel E; Attar N; Aksoy G
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18335732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems.
    St-Georges AJ; Bolla M; Fortin D; Muller-Bolla M; Thompson JY; Stamatiades PJ
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 16268393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Kulunk S; Ural C; Kulunk T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 16872928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping.
    Piacentini C; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 8540483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microstructure and mineral composition of dental enamel of permanent and deciduous teeth.
    De Menezes Oliveira MA; Torres CP; Gomes-Silva JM; Chinelatti MA; De Menezes FC; Palma-Dibb RG; Borsatto MC
    Microsc Res Tech; 2010 May; 73(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 19937744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation.
    Joseph VP; Rossouw PE; Basson NJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Oct; 102(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 1333728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Voit S; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12540119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) effect on stripped enamel surfaces. A SEM investigation.
    Giulio AB; Matteo Z; Serena IP; Silvia M; Luigi C
    J Dent; 2009 Mar; 37(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 19124184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative comparison of 3 enamel-stripping devices in vitro: how precisely can we strip teeth?
    Johner AM; Pandis N; Dudic A; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S168-72. PubMed ID: 23540634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
    Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites.
    Koh R; Neiva G; Dennison J; Yaman P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18264536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between different interdental stripping methods and evaluation of abrasive strips: SEM analysis.
    Grippaudo C; Cancellieri D; Grecolini ME; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 20974449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.