396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16905062)
1. Cephalometric changes in overbite and vertical facial height after removal of 4 first molars or first premolars.
Hans MG; Groisser G; Damon C; Amberman D; Nelson S; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 16905062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction.
Hans MG; Kishiyama C; Parker SH; Wolf GR; Noachtar R
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):265-74; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 7978521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction.
Sivakumar A; Valiathan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):869-75. PubMed ID: 18538251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
Waters D; Harris EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension.
Kim TK; Kim JT; Mah J; Yang WS; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 15825779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cephalometric study of the effect of extraction of lower first permanent molars.
Abu Aihaija ES; McSheny PF; Richardson A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 11314142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
Kumari M; Fida M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20141687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.
Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of first premolars extraction on vertical dimension in Italian patients with a Class I normo-divergent malocclusion. A retrospective study.
Greco M; Fichera G; Barbato E; Leonardi R
Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 20545094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertical changes in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extractions.
Al-Nimri KS
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 16448269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Reddy P; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Parkash H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11113799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions.
Hering K; Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 10515146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Growth and treatment changes distal to the mandibular first molar: a lateral cephalometric study.
Sable DL; Woods MG
Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 15264649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
Germeç D; Taner TU
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
