These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16905707)
1. Effect of MRCP introduction on ERCP practice: are there implications for service and training? Jenkins JT; Glass G; Ballantyne S; Fullarton GM Gut; 2006 Sep; 55(9):1365-6. PubMed ID: 16905707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of ERCP training in the UK. Murray IA; Pathmakanthan S; Heeley R; Donnelly MT Gut; 2001 Nov; 49(5):739-40. PubMed ID: 11693120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain. Farrell RJ; Noonan N; Mahmud N; Morrin MM; Kelleher D; Keeling PW Endoscopy; 2001 Aug; 33(8):668-75. PubMed ID: 11490382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors]. Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Gaa J; Meier-Willersen HJ; Wendl K; Georgi M Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10370410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ERCP and MRCP--when and why. Albert JG; Riemann JF Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2002 Jun; 16(3):399-419. PubMed ID: 12079266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation. Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the next millennium. Devereaux CE; Binmoeller KF Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Jan; 10(1):117-33, vii. PubMed ID: 10618458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Textor HJ; Flacke S; Pauleit D; Keller E; Neubrand M; Terjung B; Gieseke J; Scheurlen C; Sauerbruch T; Schild HH Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):984-90. PubMed ID: 12471543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical training in gastrointestinal procedures within a UK gynaecological oncology subspecialty programme. Williams J; Acheson N; Renninson J; Gee A; Daniels I BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1299; author reply 1299-1301. PubMed ID: 20722645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Meagher S; Yusoff I; Kennedy W; Martel M; Adam V; Barkun A Endoscopy; 2007 Mar; 39(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 17385107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Sica GT; Braver J; Cooney MJ; Miller FH; Chai JL; Adams DF Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 10207456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease. Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of intrahepatic stones: superiority of MR cholangiopancreatography over endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Kim TK; Kim BS; Kim JH; Ha HK; Kim PN; Kim AY; Lee MG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 12130445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought. Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Griffin N; Wastle ML; Dunn WK; Ryder SD; Beckingham IJ Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jul; 15(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 12811312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]