These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16907960)

  • 1. Detection of Burkholderia cepacia DNA from artificially infected EDTA-blood and lung tissue comparing different DNA isolation methods.
    Merk S; Meyer H; Greiser-Wilke I; Sprague LD; Neubauer H
    J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2006 Aug; 53(6):281-5. PubMed ID: 16907960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different methods for the isolation of Burkholderia cepacia DNA from pure cultures and waste water.
    Merk S; Neubauer H; Meyer H; Greiser-Wilke I
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2001 Nov; 204(2-3):127-31. PubMed ID: 11759155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistent bacteraemia caused by a single clone of Burkholderia cepacia with unusual phenotype.
    Teng LJ; Hsueh PR; Pan HJ; Ho SW; Luh KT
    J Infect; 2001 Apr; 42(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 11545553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of five commercial nucleic acid extraction kits for their ability to inactivate Bacillus anthracis spores and comparison of DNA yields from spores and spiked environmental samples.
    Dauphin LA; Moser BD; Bowen MD
    J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Jan; 76(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18824041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usefulness of Sau-PCR for molecular epidemiology of nosocomial outbreaks due to Burkholderia cepacia which occurred in a local hospital in Guangzhou, China.
    Yan H; Shi L; Alam MJ; Li L; Yang L; Yamasaki S
    Microbiol Immunol; 2008 May; 52(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 18557899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The suitability of selected methods of nucleic acid extraction for detecting Rhodococcus equi DNA in tracheobronchial wash fluid using PCR.
    Zietek-Barszcz A; Gradzki Z
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2010; 13(3):409-13. PubMed ID: 21033553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of five methods for extracting DNA from paucicellular clinical samples.
    Cler L; Bu D; Lewis C; Euhus D
    Mol Cell Probes; 2006; 20(3-4):191-6. PubMed ID: 16516438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular detection of Burkholderia cepacia in toiletry, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical raw materials and finished products.
    Jimenez L; Smalls S; Jimenez L; Smalls S
    J AOAC Int; 2000; 83(4):963-6. PubMed ID: 10995122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibitor-free DNA for real-time PCR analysis of synovial fluid from horses, cattle and pigs.
    Schneeweiss W; Stanek C; Wagner M; Hein I
    Vet Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 121(1-2):189-93. PubMed ID: 17222992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An inter-laboratory ring trial for the detection and isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from raw milk artificially contaminated with naturally infected faeces.
    Donaghy JA; Rowe MT; Rademaker JL; Hammer P; Herman L; De Jonghe V; Blanchard B; Duhem K; Vindel E
    Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 17993386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Detection of rhodococcus equi by microbiological culture and by polymerase chain reaction in samples of tracheobronchial secretions of foals].
    Venner M; Heyers P; Strutzberg-Minder K; Lorenz N; Verspohl J; Klug E
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2007; 120(3-4):126-33. PubMed ID: 17416135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taxon K, a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, comprises at least two novel species, Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov.
    Vanlaere E; Baldwin A; Gevers D; Henry D; De Brandt E; LiPuma JJ; Mahenthiralingam E; Speert DP; Dowson C; Vandamme P
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2009 Jan; 59(Pt 1):102-11. PubMed ID: 19126732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resistance of Acanthamoeba to classic DNA extraction methods used for the diagnosis of corneal infections.
    Goldschmidt P; Degorge S; Saint-Jean C; Yera H; Zekhnini F; Batellier L; Laroche L; Chaumeil C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 17965106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overrepresentation of immunostimulatory CpG motifs in Burkholderia genomes.
    Coenye T; Vandamme P
    J Cyst Fibros; 2005 Sep; 4(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 15963770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Burkholderia cenocepacia, B. multivorans, B. ambifaria and B. vietnamiensis isolates from cystic fibrosis patients have different profiles of exoenzyme production.
    Carvalho AP; Ventura GM; Pereira CB; Leão RS; Folescu TW; Higa L; Teixeira LM; Plotkowski MC; Merquior VL; Albano RM; Marques EA
    APMIS; 2007 Apr; 115(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 17504297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of Taylorella equigenitalis responsible for contagious equine metritis in equine genital swabs by direct polymerase chain reaction.
    Duquesne F; Pronost S; Laugier C; Petry S
    Res Vet Sci; 2007 Feb; 82(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 16806331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of commercial systems for identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei versus Burkholderia cepacia.
    Kiratisin P; Santanirand P; Chantratita N; Kaewdaeng S
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Nov; 59(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 17916419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of bacterial DNA in blood samples from febrile patients: underestimated infection or emerging contamination?
    Peters RP; Mohammadi T; Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM; Danner SA; van Agtmael MA; Savelkoul PH
    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 15364111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revised approach for identification of isolates within the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of clinical isolates not assigned to any of the known genomovars.
    Turton JF; Arif N; Hennessy D; Kaufmann ME; Pitt TL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 45(9):3105-8. PubMed ID: 17626169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DGGE with genomic DNA: suitable for detection of numerically important organisms but not for identification of the most abundant organisms.
    de Araújo JC; Schneider RP
    Water Res; 2008 Dec; 42(20):5002-10. PubMed ID: 18929384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.