198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16908086)
1. The risk of upcoding in casemix systems: a comparative study.
Steinbusch PJ; Oostenbrink JB; Zuurbier JJ; Schaepkens FJ
Health Policy; 2007 May; 81(2-3):289-99. PubMed ID: 16908086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Upcoding--a risk for the use of diagnosis-related groups].
Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Jul; 125(28-29):852-6. PubMed ID: 10943214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective payment to encourage system wide quality improvement.
McNair P; Borovnicar D; Jackson T; Gillett S
Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19194336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(165):43753-4236. PubMed ID: 19827228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicare upcoding and hospital ownership.
Silverman E; Skinner J
J Health Econ; 2004 Mar; 23(2):369-89. PubMed ID: 15019762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare program: changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2009 rates; payments for graduate medical education in certain emergency situations; changes to disclosure of physician ownership in hospitals and physician self-referral rules; updates to the long-term care prospective payment system; updates to certain IPPS-excluded hospitals; and collection of information regarding financial relationships between hospitals. Final rules.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(161):48433-9084. PubMed ID: 18956499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ambulatory casemix in Australia: APGs or AVGs?
Jackson T
Aust Health Rev; 1991; 14(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 10117340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development of an Australian national classification system for social work practice in health care.
Pockett R; Lord B; Dennis J
Soc Work Health Care; 2001; 34(1-2):177-93. PubMed ID: 12219766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Designing a funding system for rehabilitation services. Part 1: Rationale and recent developments.
Duckett S; Gray L; Howe A
Aust Health Rev; 1995; 18(3):30-44. PubMed ID: 10152273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.
Atkinson G; Murray R
J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk-adjusted capitation funding models for chronic disease in Australia: alternatives to casemix funding.
Antioch KM; Walsh MK
Eur J Health Econ; 2002; 3(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 15609134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Issues in casemix funding for acute inpatient psychiatric services and their relevance to mental health nursing.
Fanker S
Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs; 1996 Sep; 5(3):95-102. PubMed ID: 9079304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DRGs as management information or reimbursement method.
Sheill A
Aust Health Rev; 1993; 16(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 10129458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in the Medicare home health care market: the impact of reimbursement policy.
Choi S; Davitt JK
Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19194328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Will CMS's adoption of severity-adjusted DRGs promote upcoding?
Healthc Financ Manage; 2007 Apr; 61(4):132. PubMed ID: 17427475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Do hospitals respond to changing incentive structures? Evidence from Medicare's 2007 DRG restructuring.
Cook A; Averett S
J Health Econ; 2020 Sep; 73():102319. PubMed ID: 32653652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The development of a case group concept for patients with mental diseases].
Andreas S; Dirmaier J; Koch U; Schulz H
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2003 May; 71(5):234-42. PubMed ID: 12740754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Development of classification and payment system of in patient hospital admissions in the United States: introduction of Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups (MS-DRGs) and the Present On Admission (POA) indicator].
Maurici M; Rosati E
Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2007; 63(6):691-701. PubMed ID: 18216884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effects of self-adapting G-DRG system 2004 to 2006 on in-patient services payment in pediatric hematology and oncology patients of a university hospital].
Christaras A; Schaper J; Strelow H; Laws HJ; Göbel U
Klin Padiatr; 2006; 218(6):366-78. PubMed ID: 17080340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
