168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16908582)
1. MR angiography of the great anterior radiculomedullary artery (Adamkiewicz artery) validated by digital subtraction angiography.
Nijenhuis RJ; Mull M; Wilmink JT; Thron AK; Backes WH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Aug; 27(7):1565-72. PubMed ID: 16908582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value and limitations of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in spinal arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas.
Mull M; Nijenhuis RJ; Backes WH; Krings T; Wilmink JT; Thron A
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Aug; 28(7):1249-58. PubMed ID: 17698524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of spinal cord arteries and veins by time-resolved MR angiography.
Jaspers K; Nijenhuis RJ; Backes WH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 17659566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Improved localization of spinal AV fistulas using contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3 T].
Boeckh-Behrens T; Bitterling H; Schichor C; Brückmann H; Seelos K
Rofo; 2010 Jan; 182(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 19517337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of combined acquisition of low-dose time-resolved and single-phase high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in a single session for pre-angiographic evaluation of spinal vascular disease.
Shin JH; Choi Y; Park B; Shin NY; Jang J; Choi HS; Jung SL; Ahn K; Kim BS
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214289. PubMed ID: 30921365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas at 3T.
Zhou G; Li MH; Lu C; Yin YL; Zhu YQ; Wei XE; Lu HT; Zheng QQ; Gao WW
J Neuroradiol; 2017 Feb; 44(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27814888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR angiography of the spine and spinal cord.
Pattany PM; Saraf-Lavi E; Bowen BC
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Dec; 14(6):444-60. PubMed ID: 14872165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla.
Wei LM; Zhu YQ; Zhang PL; Lu HT; Zhao JG
J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Feb; 26(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 30580695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for pre-angiographic evaluation of suspected spinal dural arterial venous fistulas.
Saindane AM; Boddu SR; Tong FC; Dehkharghani S; Dion JE
J Neurointerv Surg; 2015 Feb; 7(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 24463440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy and utility of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: the Toronto experience.
Lindenholz A; TerBrugge KG; van Dijk JM; Farb RI
Eur Radiol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):2885-94. PubMed ID: 25015136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Hansmann J; Morelli JN; Michaely HJ; Riester T; Budjan J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1486-93. PubMed ID: 24338813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Preoperative imaging in 78 living kidney donors using CE-MRA and DSA].
Lemke U; Taupitz M; Klüner C; Giessing M; Schönberger B; Hamm B; Kröncke TJ
Rofo; 2008 Jan; 180(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 18092278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with MR angiography.
Bowen BC; Fraser K; Kochan JP; Pattany PM; Green BA; Quencer RM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995; 16(10):2029-43. PubMed ID: 8585491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brain arteriovenous malformation diagnosis: value of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0T compared to DSA.
Machet A; Portefaix C; Kadziolka K; Robin G; Lanoix O; Pierot L
Neuroradiology; 2012 Oct; 54(10):1099-108. PubMed ID: 22407410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 0.5-M Gd-DTPA with 1.0-M gadobutrol for magnetic resonance angiography of the supplying arteries of the spinal cord in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm patients.
Nijenhuis RJ; Gerretsen S; Leiner T; Jacobs MJ; van Engelshoven JM; Backes WH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 15971172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pedal artery imaging--a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound.
Hofmann WJ; Forstner R; Kofler B; Binder K; Ugurluoglu A; Magometschnigg H
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 24(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 12323169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
