These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16909491)

  • 1. Senate removes abortion option for young girls.
    Hulse C
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 16909491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. House passes abortion bill on minors.
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Sep; ():A23. PubMed ID: 17014048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
    Blasdell J
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution.
    Hayhurst MB
    Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
    Storrow RF; Martinez S
    Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scant drop seen in abortions if parents are told.
    Lehren A; Leland J
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Mar; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 16528886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
    Ehrlich JS
    Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II.
    Graziano SG
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Splitting the baby: when can a pregnant minor obtain an abortion without parental consent? The Ex parte Anonymous cases (Alabama 2001).
    Rosenberg SP
    Conn Law Rev; 2002; 34(3):1109-41. PubMed ID: 15212029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Access to abortion pared at state level.
    Connolly C
    Washington Post; 2005 Aug; ():A1, A4. PubMed ID: 16514735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W
    Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion rule for under-18's upset by judge.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Nov; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Justices deadlocked on state laws restricting minors' access to abortion.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():B16. PubMed ID: 11646635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion notification bill resurfaces in Richmond.
    Hockstader L
    Washington Post; 1987 Jan; ():D1, D13. PubMed ID: 11647810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court to tackle abortion again after 5 years; parent notification case; in considering technical issues, justices rejoin a fractious debate.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 May; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 15948341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.