These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16910751)

  • 1. A metacognitive approach to "implicit" and "explicit" evaluations: comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006).
    Petty RE; Briñol P
    Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 132(5):740-744. PubMed ID: 16910751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are associative and propositional processes qualitatively distinct? Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006).
    Kruglanski AW; Dechesne M
    Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 132(5):736-739. PubMed ID: 16910750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.
    Gawronski B; Bodenhausen GV
    Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 132(5):692-731. PubMed ID: 16910748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitudes and attitude change.
    Bohner G; Dickel N
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2011; 62():391-417. PubMed ID: 20809791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Propositional Versus Dual-Process Accounts of Evaluative Conditioning: I. The Effects of Co-Occurrence and Relational Information on Implicit and Explicit Evaluations.
    Hu X; Gawronski B; Balas R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jan; 43(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 27856729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006).
    Albarracín D; Hart W; McCulloch KC
    Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 132(5):732-735. PubMed ID: 16910749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward self harm: support for a functional model.
    Knowles SE; Townsend E
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2012 Jun; 43(2):730-6. PubMed ID: 22100380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Of two minds or one? A registered replication of Rydell et al. (2006).
    Heycke T; Gehrmann S; Haaf JM; Stahl C
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Dec; 32(8):1708-1727. PubMed ID: 29383978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Can Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Both Be Changed? Testing Two Interventions to Promote Consumption of Green Vegetables.
    Mattavelli S; Avishai A; Perugini M; Richetin J; Sheeran P
    Ann Behav Med; 2017 Aug; 51(4):511-518. PubMed ID: 28124183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consider the source: persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by source credibility.
    Smith CT; De Houwer J; Nosek BA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Feb; 39(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 23386656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: an exploration of the PAST model.
    Petty RE; Tormala ZL; Briñol P; Jarvis WB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 16448308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations.
    Peters KR; Gawronski B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Apr; 37(4):557-69. PubMed ID: 21441218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. First thought, best thought: positive mood maintains and negative mood degrades implicit-explicit attitude correspondence.
    Huntsinger JR; Smith CT
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Feb; 35(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 19141623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who owns implicit attitudes? Testing a metacognitive perspective.
    Cooley E; Payne BK; Loersch C; Lei R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 25422315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: a systems of reasoning analysis.
    Rydell RJ; McConnell AR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):995-1008. PubMed ID: 17144760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the effects of explicit and implicit bidimensional attitudes on objectively measured speeding behaviour.
    McCartan R; Elliott MA; Pagani S; Finnegan E; Kelly SW
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Jul; 57(3):630-651. PubMed ID: 29601645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of attitude formation, persuasive message, and source expertise on attitude change: an examination based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model and the Attitude Formation Theory].
    Nakamura M; Saito K; Wakabayashi M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1990 Apr; 61(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2250413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Four Deadly Sins of Implicit Attitude Research.
    Sherman JW; Klein SAW
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():604340. PubMed ID: 33536976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitude importance as a moderator of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitude measures.
    Karpinski A; Steinman RB; Hilton JL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jul; 31(7):949-62. PubMed ID: 15951366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resistance to persuasion and attitude certainty: the moderating role of elaboration.
    Tormala ZL; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1446-57. PubMed ID: 15448308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.