222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16911770)
21. Incidence and outcome of caesarean section in the private sector--3-year experience at Pretoria Gynaecological Hospital.
Tshibangu KC; de Jongh MA; de Villiers DJ; du Toit JJ; Shah SM
S Afr Med J; 2002 Dec; 92(12):956-9. PubMed ID: 12561407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A Systematic Evaluation of Hospital Performance of Childbirth Delivery Modes and Associated Factors in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.
Cegolon L; Mastrangelo G; Heymann WC; Dal Pozzo G; Ronfani L; Barbone F
Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19442. PubMed ID: 31857615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.
Hsu CC; Shieh GR; Wu CS; Shen HC; Tang CH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.
Main EK; Chang SC; Cheng YW; Rosenstein MG; Lagrew DC
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 33156193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differences in rates and odds for emergency caesarean section in six Palestinian hospitals: a population-based birth cohort study.
Zimmo M; Laine K; Hassan S; Fosse E; Lieng M; Ali-Masri H; Zimmo K; Anti M; Bottcher B; Sørum Falk R; Vikanes Å
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e019509. PubMed ID: 29500211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies for cesarean delivery rates.
Bailit J; Garrett J
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 102(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 12850606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Consumer reports in health care. Do they make a difference in patient care?
Longo DR; Land G; Schramm W; Fraas J; Hoskins B; Howell V
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1579-84. PubMed ID: 9370503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates.
Bailit JL; Dooley SL; Peaceman AN
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 93(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 10362175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section.
Lomas J; Enkin M; Anderson GM; Hannah WJ; Vayda E; Singer J
JAMA; 1991 May; 265(17):2202-7. PubMed ID: 2013952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance.
Aron DC; Harper DL; Shepardson LB; Rosenthal GE
JAMA; 1998 Jun; 279(24):1968-72. PubMed ID: 9643860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Thromboembolism prophylaxis and cesarean section: a survey of general obstetricians.
Connolly T
South Med J; 2003 Feb; 96(2):146-8. PubMed ID: 12630638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Trend in primary caesarean delivery: a five-year experience in ABRUZZO, ITALY.
Di Giovanni P; Garzarella T; Di Martino G; Schioppa FS; Romano F; Staniscia T
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jul; 18(1):514. PubMed ID: 29970095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Determinants of cesarean delivery: a classification tree analysis.
Stivanello E; Rucci P; Lenzi J; Fantini MP
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jun; 14():215. PubMed ID: 24973937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A prospective observational study of emergency caesarean section rates and the effect of the labour ward experience.
Griffiths AN; Avasarala S; Wiener JJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 25(7):666-8. PubMed ID: 16263540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of patient risk on the volume-outcome relationship in obstetric delivery services.
Lee KS; Kwak JM
Health Policy; 2014 Dec; 118(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 24957418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.
Wilson BL; Effken J; Butler RJ
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Jun; 42(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 20618597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Definition and adjustment of Cesarean section rates and assessments of hospital performance.
Kritchevsky SB; Braun BI; Gross PA; Newcomb CS; Kelleher CA; Simmons BP
Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Aug; 11(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 10501598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Cesarean sections in the Centre-Val de Loire region: Practices and indications-the Robson Classification].
Lecuyer AI; Baron S; Diguisto C; Laurent E; Turpin D; Potin J; Grammatico-Guillon L
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2020 Aug; 68(4):253-259. PubMed ID: 32591237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Medical and non-medical factors associated with cesarean section rates in a university hospital in southern Brazil].
Freitas PF; Sakae TM; Jacomino ME
Cad Saude Publica; 2008 May; 24(5):1051-61. PubMed ID: 18461234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Factors associated with cesarean section rates in a university hospital].
Sakae TM; Freitas PF; d'Orsi E
Rev Saude Publica; 2009 Jun; 43(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 19448914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
