These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. An introductory letter in advance of a telephone survey may increase response rate. Majowicz SE; Edge VL; Flint J; Sockett P; Doré K; McDougall L; Remple V; Fyfe M; Henson S; Gaebel K Can Commun Dis Rep; 2004 Jul; 30(13):121-3. PubMed ID: 15248524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different approaches for a survey of the general population. Signorelli C; Osborn JF Ann Ig; 1998; 10(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 9658669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) for health surveys in public health surveillance: methodological issues and challenges ahead. Choi BC Chronic Dis Can; 2004; 25(2):21-7. PubMed ID: 15554608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Given the increasing bias in random digit dial sampling, could respondent-driven sampling be a practical alternative? Lee R; Ranaldi J; Cummings M; Crucetti JB; Stratton H; McNutt LA Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 21376274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chapter II. Differences between the telephone and personal interview data. Groves RM; Miller PV; Cannell CF Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):11-9. PubMed ID: 15791751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The telephone interview: the methodological strategy for collecting population data]. Cassiani SH; Zanetti ML; Pelá NT Rev Paul Enferm; 1992; 11(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 1306290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of the Waksberg telephone sampling method for the selection of population controls. Perneger TV; Myers TL; Klag MJ; Whelton PK Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 138(8):574-84. PubMed ID: 8237981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chapter I. Study design. Cannell CF; Groves RM; Miller PV; Thornberry OT Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):5-10. PubMed ID: 15791750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of factors influencing telephone call response rate in an epidemiological study. Matías-Guiu J; Serrano-Castro PJ; Mauri-Llerda JÁ; Hernández-Ramos FJ; Sánchez-Alvarez JC; Sanz M ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():179375. PubMed ID: 25401127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recruitment of a representative elderly population by random digit dialing. Wallace MC; Retief DH Gerodontics; 1987 Oct; 3(5):209-11. PubMed ID: 3481703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Telephone directory listings of presumptive Chinese surnames: an appropriate sampling frame for a dispersed population with characteristic surnames. Hage BH; Oliver RG; Powles JW; Wahlqvist ML Epidemiology; 1990 Sep; 1(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 2078618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Telephone vs. mail surveys. Which is best for post-discharge data collection? Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Nov; 14(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 10175266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Population inferences from targeted sampling with uncertain epidemiologic information. Williams MS; Ebel ED; Wells SJ Prev Vet Med; 2009 May; 89(1-2):25-33. PubMed ID: 19200614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The telephone survey: a procedure for assessing educational needs of nurses. Hash V; Donlea J; Walljasper D Nurs Res; 1985; 34(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 3844733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Smoking survey in the general population of Santiago]. Medina E; Pascual JP; Cumsille F; Alegria A; Gutiérrez L; Corvalán L; Birón M; Cabrera V; Larrañaga J; Carcamo C Rev Med Chil; 1986 Mar; 114(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 3809800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Interviewer effects in a telephone survey: a word to the wise. Frasure-Smith N Nurs Pap; 1987; 19(4):37-48. PubMed ID: 3455536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Guest editorial: health surveillance in Canada. Mowat D Chronic Dis Can; 1998; 19(4):143-4. PubMed ID: 10029509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]