These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16912733)

  • 1. Influence of random-dot textures on perception of suprathreshold color differences.
    Huertas R; Melgosa M; Hita E
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2006 Sep; 23(9):2067-76. PubMed ID: 16912733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.
    Liu H; Huang M; Cui G; Luo MR; Melgosa M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Apr; 30(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 23595320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental ceramics: a CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences.
    Perez Mdel M; Ghinea R; Herrera LJ; Ionescu AM; Pomares H; Pulgar R; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e37-44. PubMed ID: 21986320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigations of suprathreshold color-difference tolerances with different visual scales and different perceptual correlates using CRT colors.
    Wang Z; Xu H
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Dec; 25(12):2908-17. PubMed ID: 19037380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative significance of the terms in the CIEDE2000 and CIE94 color-difference formulas.
    Melgosa M; Huertas R; Berns RS
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Dec; 21(12):2269-75. PubMed ID: 15603061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of the relationship between perceived and computed color differences.
    García PA; Huertas R; Melgosa M; Cui G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Jul; 24(7):1823-9. PubMed ID: 17728805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chromatic and luminance sensitivity for skin and skinlike textures.
    Chauhan T; Xiao K; Wuerger S
    J Vis; 2019 Jan; 19(1):13. PubMed ID: 30677123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of suprathreshold naturalistic changes in colored natural images.
    To MP; Lovell PG; Troscianko T; Tolhurst DJ
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):12.1-22. PubMed ID: 20465332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Color difference thresholds for computer-simulated human Gingiva.
    Pérez MM; Ghinea R; Herrera LJ; Carrillo F; Ionescu AM; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 30(2):E24-E30. PubMed ID: 29476587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How color difference formulas depend on reference pairs in the underlying constant stimuli experiment.
    Kirchner E; Dekker N; Lucassen M; Njo L; van der Lans I; Koeckhoven P; Urban P; Huertas R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Dec; 32(12):2373-83. PubMed ID: 26831391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Color and lightness constancy in different perceptual tasks.
    Schneider N; von Campenhausen C
    Biol Cybern; 1998 Dec; 79(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 9861694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Translucency thresholds for dental materials.
    Salas M; Lucena C; Herrera LJ; Yebra A; Della Bona A; Pérez MM
    Dent Mater; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 29764698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromatic variations suppress suprathreshold brightness variations.
    Kingdom FA; Bell J; Gheorghiu E; Malkoc G
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):13. PubMed ID: 20884478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thresholds of color attribute differences in detecting camouflaged textures.
    Yamashita Y; Lee P; Sunaga S
    J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci; 2004 Nov; 23(6):237-41. PubMed ID: 15599068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametric effects on the evaluation of threshold chromaticity differences using red printed samples.
    Brusola F; Tortajada I; Jordá B; Melgosa M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):510-517. PubMed ID: 31044969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of select color-difference formulas in the blue region.
    Shamey R; Cao R; Tomasino T; Zaidy SS; Iqbal K; Lin J; Lee SG
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Jun; 31(6):1328-36. PubMed ID: 24977373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integration of differing chromaticities in early and midlevel spatial vision.
    Wilson JA; Switkes E
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Oct; 22(10):2169-81. PubMed ID: 16277286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch.
    Douglas RD; Steinhauer TJ; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):200-8. PubMed ID: 17499089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From CIE 2006 physiological model to improved age-dependent and average colorimetric observers.
    Sarkar A; Autrusseau F; Viénot F; Le Callet P; Blondé L
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Oct; 28(10):2033-48. PubMed ID: 21979508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Gómez-Polo C; Portillo Muñoz M; Lorenzo Luengo MC; Vicente P; Galindo P; Martín Casado AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 26412001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.