These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16913107)

  • 1. Mercury speciation in coal-fired power plant plumes observed at three surface sites in the southeastern U.S.
    Edgerton ES; Hartsell BE; Jansen JJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Aug; 40(15):4563-70. PubMed ID: 16913107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling mercury in power plant plumes.
    Lohman K; Seigneur C; Edgerton E; Jansen J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(12):3848-54. PubMed ID: 16830552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavior of mercury emissions from a commercial coal-fired power plant: the relationship between stack speciation and near-field plume measurements.
    Landis MS; Ryan JV; ter Schure AF; Laudal D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(22):13540-8. PubMed ID: 25325168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mercury speciation and mass distribution of coal-fired power plants in Taiwan using different air pollution control processes.
    Chou CP; Chiu CH; Chang TC; Hsi HC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 May; 71(5):553-563. PubMed ID: 33284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speciation and mass-balance of mercury from pulverized coal fired power plants burning western Canadian subbituminous coals.
    Goodarzi F
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):792-8. PubMed ID: 15480492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at a residential neighborhood impacted by industrial sources.
    Manolopoulos H; Snyder DC; Schauer JJ; Hill JS; Turner JR; Olson ML; Krabbenhoft DP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Aug; 41(16):5626-33. PubMed ID: 17874765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mercury Emission Ratios from Coal-Fired Power Plants in the Southeastern United States during NOMADSS.
    Ambrose JL; Gratz LE; Jaffe DA; Campos T; Flocke FM; Knapp DJ; Stechman DM; Stell M; Weinheimer AJ; Cantrell CA; Mauldin RL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 49(17):10389-97. PubMed ID: 26161912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mercury speciation and emissions from coal combustion in Guiyang, Southwest China.
    Tang S; Feng X; Qiu J; Yin G; Yang Z
    Environ Res; 2007 Oct; 105(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 17517388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distribution and bioavailability of mercury in size-fractioned atmospheric particles around an ultra-low emission power plant in Southwest China.
    Zhang W; Li J; Qiu H; Guo X; Fei Z; Xing Y; Yin D
    J Environ Sci (China); 2024 Apr; 138():141-152. PubMed ID: 38135383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ambient mercury sources in Rochester, NY: results from Principle Components Analysis (PCA) of Mercury Monitoring Network Data.
    Huang J; Choi HD; Hopke PK; Holsen TM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(22):8441-5. PubMed ID: 20977262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fate and behavior of mercury in coal-fired power plants.
    Meij R; Vredenbregt LH; te Winkel H
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Aug; 52(8):912-7. PubMed ID: 12184689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of Emission Controls to Reduce the Atmospheric Concentrations of Mercury.
    Castro MS; Sherwell J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14000-7. PubMed ID: 26606506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of coal-fired power plants.
    Liu SH; Yan NQ; Liu ZR; Qu Z; Wang HP; Chang SG; Miller C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(4):1405-12. PubMed ID: 17593749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power plant on ambient mercury species.
    Wang Y; Huang J; Hopke PK; Rattigan OV; Chalupa DC; Utell MJ; Holsen TM
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jul; 92(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 23422172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. As, Hg, and Se flue gas sampling in a coal-fired power plant and their fate during coal combustion.
    Otero-Rey JR; López-Vilariño JM; Moreda-Piñeiro J; Alonso-Rodríguez E; Muniategui-Lorenzo S; López-Mahía P; Prada-Rodríguez D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5262-7. PubMed ID: 14655716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of mercury and chlorine content of coal on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China.
    Zhang L; Wang S; Meng Y; Hao J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):6385-92. PubMed ID: 22533359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mobility and contamination assessment of mercury in coal fly ash, atmospheric deposition, and soil collected from Tianjin, China.
    Wei Z; Wu G; Su R; Li C; Liang P
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 21713969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mercury accumulation in soil from atmospheric deposition in temperate steppe of Inner Mongolia, China.
    Cheng Z; Tang Y; Li E; Wu Q; Wang L; Liu K; Wang S; Huang Y; Duan L
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Mar; 258():113692. PubMed ID: 31818621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Updated emission inventories for speciated atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic sources in China.
    Zhang L; Wang S; Wang L; Wu Y; Duan L; Wu Q; Wang F; Yang M; Yang H; Hao J; Liu X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3185-94. PubMed ID: 25655106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atmospheric mercury speciation: laboratory and field evaluation of a mist chamber method for measuring reactive gaseous mercury.
    Stratton WJ; Lindberg SE; Perry CJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Jan; 35(1):170-7. PubMed ID: 11352006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.